As the year draws to a close, there have been a couple of advances on the environmental front that deserve cheers — such as moves at central and local levels to expand restrictions on retailers from providing plastic shopping bags, disposable food packaging and eating utensils — but one effort to curb industrial penollution also serves as a reminder of how much more work lies ahead.
The central government this week approved the Kaohsiung City Government’s decision to ban factories along the Houjin (後勁溪) and Shihlong (獅龍溪) rivers and Cingpu Ditch (青埔溝) from using ammonium chloride, as well as control ammonia nitrogen emissions along the waterways, although the Legislative Yuan needs to amend the Water Pollution Control Act (水污染防治法) before the changes can be implemented.
This announcement came more than six months after Kaohsiung lost a lawsuit at the High Administrative Court over its fining of Advanced Semiconductor Engineering (ASE) for discharging toxic wastewater into the Houjin River between 2007 and 2013.
The lawsuit stemmed from an investigation into ASE dumping toxic water into Houjin in early December 2013. That discovery led the city to fine the company NT$102 million (US$3.4 million at the current exchange rate); it also triggered protests against ASE, which led its chairman to promise the firm would donate up to NT$3 billion over 30 years to promote environmental protection, even though the company argued the discharge was a once-off incident.
However, the Environmental Protection Administration’s (EPA) pollution management database and probes by the Kaohsiung Environmental Protection Bureau showed the firm had long been a serial offender.
ASE was not the only Kaohsiung company caught dumping that month: Lian-yi Industrial Co used pipes connected to the rainwater sewer system to dispose of wastewater that was even more toxic than ASE’s.
Cynics were quick to ask if Kaohsiung officials felt the need to act following the release of the documentary Beyond Beauty: Taiwan From Above (看見台灣) in November 2013, a film that showed the extent of the Houjin River’s damaged state, as its waters ran red.
More than four years later, the city and central governments are finally moving to halt further damage to waterways passing near industrial zones in Kaohsiung — waters that are also used to irrigate more than 1,600 hectares of farmland — but the proposed measures are still at least two years away from taking effect.
The two governments said they want laws amended so that the changes can be implemented by 2020, but as we have seen with the debate over amending the Mining Act (礦業法) during the current legislative session, wanting and achieving are very different things.
The changes would only cover pollution of Kaohsiung’s waterways — the Kaohsiung bureau blithely noted that Formosa Plastic Group’s (FPG) plant in Renwu District (仁武) pumps its wastewater out to sea. That is not reassuring, given the plant’s record. While its wastewater is processed at a separate facility before being released into the ocean, the EPA in 2009 found that soil and groundwater near the plant had been polluted by benzene and seven other pollutants at concentrations more than 20 times the government’s maximum standard, and levels of 1 ,2-dichloroethane were more than 30,000 times the standard.
This is believed to have been caused by a discharge from the plant in 2006, although FPG has always denied responsibility and was never fined or charged over it.
Two studies released this year linked the 2006 pollution to an increased incidence of kidney problems and related illnesses among residents of boroughs affected by the contamination, a link contested by FPG.
Given the damage such pollutants can cause to humans, we all should be worried about what is in industrial wastewater that is discharged into the sea. If Kaohsiung officials do not see it as their job, the central government certainly should, and take measures to ensure such discharges are truly pollutant free.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers