Noncommunicable diseases (NCDs), like heart disease, stroke, cancer, diabetes and chronic lung disease, are responsible for 70 percent of all deaths. There is incontrovertible evidence that tobacco use, inactivity, unhealthy diets and excessive alcohol consumption increase the odds of dying prematurely from an NCD.
Yet, despite widespread knowledge of the risks, global obesity goes largely unchecked, while tobacco and alcohol use continue to rise. It is against this backdrop that networks of NCD alliances met from last Saturday to Monday at the second Global NCD Alliance Forum in the United Arab Emirates.
As they search for solutions to bring NCDs under control, they should look for inspiration in the movement to fight AIDS. People living with and affected by HIV continue to drive response efforts, and their unique form of mobilization has been instrumental to progress. While the battle is not over, AIDS activists know that it can be won.
Similarly, a mobilized NCD movement can turn the tide against that epidemic. Yet, in 2015, The Lancet editor Richard Horton described the NCD community as needing an “electric shock to its semicomatose soul.”
“But who has the courage to deliver it?” he added.
There are lessons to be learned from AIDS activists. As global attention focuses on NCD prevention, those seeking to control preventable illnesses should look to the “ABCs” of AIDS organizing for guidance.
The first letter that the NCD community should consider is “A,” for activism. Anyone over 40 will recall images of AIDS activists performing “die-ins” at scientific meetings around the world. In the US, AIDS activists took to the streets, even shutting down the US Food and Drug Administration’s headquarters for a day in October 1988.
Globally, activists lobbied governments and pharmaceutical companies to make medicines more affordable. This activism continues and should serve as a model for action on NCDs.
Next, the NCD community must adopt a bolder approach to budgets — the “B” of the AIDS movement’s strategy. Civic organizing and grassroots activism may fuel early energies, but organizing and sustaining a broad-based coalition takes money.
The AIDS movement was clear about this from the beginning, and lobbied for resources to support its advocacy and accountability effectively.
“C” is for coalitions: The AIDS movement was quick to understand that progress would come only with diverse support. Activists established links between people living with HIV and those with other concerns, such as women’s rights, intellectual property, nutrition and housing.
Issue-specific coalitions and campaigns work best when they bring together government insiders and outsiders, to combine perspectives and expertise.
The AIDS movement also understood that a holistic response to the epidemic was essential if support was to spread. Thus, “D,” the determinant of success, was to draw attention to the interconnectivity of the challenge.
For example, lobbying education leaders to keep girls in school longer has contributed to providing young people with the knowledge and agency to make smart decisions about when and with whom to negotiate safe sex.
Similarly, links were forged between groups working on poverty, gender and nutrition — factors that played a role in driving the AIDS crisis. NCDs are no less isolated in their causality and similarly require a multisector approach to prevention.
Engagement — “E” — was what helped the AIDS movement become so influential. By borrowing from the playbook of the disability rights movement, which championed the mantra “Nothing About Us Without Us,” AIDS advocates demanded representation on the bodies established to address the disease.
For example, UNAIDS remains the only UN agency with seats on its board for representatives from civil society. This norm is so powerfully embedded in the AIDS movement that it would be almost unthinkable for an AIDS meeting to take place without representation from the community.
Disease prevention movements must also develop persuasive narratives, and “F” — framing the issue — was essential to the AIDS community’s effort to gain support from political leaders. In particular, access to AIDS treatment was framed as a matter of economic justice.
Framing the narrative this way led to a dramatic reduction in the price of medicines, so much so that more than half of people living with HIV in low and middle-income countries are in treatment.
An equally important framing issue for AIDS, which is highly relevant to the NCDs movement, is that of responsibility. The AIDS community worked hard to shift the focus from blaming individuals’ lifestyle choices to putting the onus on the state for providing healthcare and removing legal discrimination.
In the AIDS debate, gender — the movement’s “G” — was a significant focal point. HIV was initially seen as a “gay disease,” and gender identity was embedded in the DNA of the AIDS movement early on.
Gender dimensions of NCDs are no less important; one only has to consider how alcohol and tobacco are marketed to understand that. Gender, therefore, must become a focus of NCDs prevention efforts.
Finally, “H” — human rights — was the bedrock of the AIDS response. Campaigns were launched against discrimination in workplaces, schools and health centers. Strategic litigation helped ensure equality under the law.
The AIDS movement refused to hold major conferences in countries with punitive laws against people living with HIV. The NCD movement could take a similar tack by, for example, refusing to meet in countries that fail to restrict advertising of junk food to children.
The list of AIDS lessons could continue throughout the alphabet, but ending with “H” is apt, given that human rights drove the response and should drive the response to NCDs. Poverty, exclusion, and social and economic marginalization put people at higher risk for HIV. It is no different for NCDs.
The early mainstream reaction to the AIDS epidemic was to ask: “Why don’t those people make better choices?”
The AIDS movement made clear that that was the wrong question.
Today, with 70 percent of the planet at risk of premature death from preventable illnesses, “those people” are many of us.
The NCD and AIDS communities can learn from one another. We are a stronger movement when we join forces.
Kent Buse is chief of Strategic Policy Directions at UNAIDS. Laurel Sprague is executive director of the Global Network of People Living with HIV.
The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of UNAIDS.
Copyright: Project Syndicate 2017
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past