It has been a rough couple of months for Ksenia Pakhomova, a bright-eyed, garrulous 23-year-old from the Siberian mining town of Kemerovo, Russia. Her boyfriend was kicked out of university, her mother was fired from her teaching job at an arts school and her grandmother was threatened with dismissal from her job at a gallery.
To top it off, someone plastered notices with her photograph in public places near her home, complete with her mobile number and an offer of sexual services.
All of this appears to be linked to Pakhomova’s job: She is the regional coordinator for the presidential campaign of Alexei Navalny, an opposition politician who wants to challenge Russian President Vladimir Putin for the presidency in elections in March.
Illustration: Yusha
Putin on Wednesday last week finally declared his candidacy in a long-expected announcement and is likely to win comfortably. Standing against him are a familiar cast of political has-beens and a few spoiler candidates whom few Russians are taking seriously.
Navalny will most likely be barred from standing due to a criminal conviction in a case that was widely seen as politically motivated, but the 41-year-old anti-corruption campaigner is ignoring this.
Instead, he has chosen to engage in the kind of enthusiastic, grassroots campaigning that has been absent from Russia in recent years: real politics, in short. He has embarked on a marathon of trips across the nation’s vast expanse, holding rallies and setting up campaign headquarters.
The liberal opposition has traditionally made few inroads in places like Kemerovo, a tough, working-class region four hours by plane from Moscow.
Here, Navalny is attracting the support of a different kind of Russian from the chattering, Moscow intellectual class that many see as the natural supporters of the democratic opposition.
Navalny’s supporters are mainly young Russians who have known little in their lifetimes except a Putin presidency.
Pakhomova, who studied law at university, said she was not particularly political until earlier this year, when she started watching Navalny’s videos.
She was particularly horrified by a video alleging staggering corruption on the part of Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev, which led to major protests in Moscow and other cities earlier this year.
In Kemerovo, she began volunteering for the local Navalny campaign and in time she was appointed head of the local office.
“Everyone in Russia knows that officials are corrupt, but when you see the details, how openly they think they can do it, it’s shocking,” she said.
Ksenia’s mother, 46-year-old Natalia Pakhomova, said she was warned in September that she should prevent her daughter from working for Navalny, but refused.
At the end of October, she was removed from her job on the pretext that anonymous parents had called the local administration and complained that teachers at her school were soliciting bribes. She had worked at the school for 26 years and in April had received a medal from the local governor for her service.
Natalia’s 67-year-old mother, who works as a gallery attendant in the local art museum, was asked by her boss to talk her granddaughter out of working for Navalny and was also threatened with dismissal. She is on sick leave, which Natalia said was due to frayed nerves from the incident.
Ksenia’s boyfriend was kicked out of university, although he has since been reinstated after an online campaign.
Navalny has said that if he is not allowed on the ballot, he will call for an “active boycott” of the elections.
“No other candidate has opened regional offices, no other candidate is properly campaigning,” he said in an interview in Moscow. “How can you have real elections without the only candidate who is campaigning?”
Navalny said that since the beginning of the year, campaign staff had between them spent more than 2,000 days in jail and been fined more than 10 million roubles (US$168,600).
“What’s happening in Kemerovo is extreme, but it’s a pattern across Russia and it’s clearly directed from the top,” he said.
In nearly every region, activists have found it hard to rent office space from which to run the campaign. In Kemerovo, Pakhomova’s team is looking to move office after its landlord said the local administration called him and warned him not to rent to the Navalny campaign.
Whenever Navalny travels, authorities also create problems, and he has been jailed or assaulted on numerous occasions this year. When he visited Kemerovo earlier this autumn, local authorities canceled public transport to the area on the outskirts of town where they had given Navalny permission to speak.
Despite all this, more than 2,000 people attended the rally, making it one of the biggest demonstrations in Kemerovo since the miners’ strikes in the late 1980s and early 1990s that heralded the collapse of the Soviet Union.
Views on how much damage Navalny can cause with his message that Putin’s inner circle are “crooks and thieves” vary. In Kemerovo, many people have still not heard of Navalny and among those who have, views are mixed.
Kemerovo Navalny campaign deputy head Boris Pavlov holds frequent solo pickets — gatherings of more than one person require permission — with a Navalny sign in the center of Kemerovo.
“Sometimes people come to shake my hand, but other times I’ve had people spit at me and call me a traitor,” he said.
State television has long denied Navalny access to the airwaves and claimed the opposition is working to promote foreign interests in Russia. Kremlin insiders portray him as a marginal figure who poses no serious electoral threat.
“His limit would be 5 to 10 percent in big cities and 2 to 3 percent overall,” one source close to the Kremlin said, adding that the only reason to keep him off the ballot was to prevent “negative vibes” around the election.
“He’d have three months of telling everyone that the government is lying and corrupt, and nobody wants to listen to that,” the source said.
However, there are signs that Navalny’s message could potentially resonate among a new audience in a nation where up to now, Putin has managed to remain above widespread anger at corruption.
Natalia, Ksenia’s mother, was always a Putin fan. She voted for him in the last election in 2012 and even bought Ksenia a Putin-themed calendar as a present that year, because her daughter was too young to vote, with the election falling a few days before her 18th birthday.
However, recent events have led to a recalibration of her views.
“Ksenia made me listen to the Navalny videos and I’ll be honest, I’ve realized he’s really saying the right things. It has completely changed my views on politics,” she said.
Hers is not the only case of children changing the minds of their parents. At a training session run by Ksenia on how to deal with the police last week, all but one of the eight attendees was under 18.
Dima, 14, was initially scolded by his mother for attending Navalny-backed protests in Kemerovo earlier this year, after the child support agency showed up at his house to complain.
However, she is now helping to collect signatures for the campaign and proudly took a selfie with Navalny when he came to Kemerovo.
“My mother had some problems with her politics,” Dima said with the tone of a parent indulging an errant child, rather than vice versa. “But afterward she started watching Navalny’s videos and her political understanding is now more developed.”
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US