When Poland’s main business lobby hosted a debate on the pros and cons of euro membership last month, the country’s former central bank governor Marek Belka surprised the audience by issuing a ringing endorsement for joining the euro.
For a man who resisted a switch to the single currency during the Greek crisis, his call for deeper integration now — echoed by attending executives — revealed how alarmed eastern Europe’s corporate elite is by the nationalism running through their governments and on the streets.
It is the same story in Hungarian business circles and in the Czech Republic, where Czech Prime Minister Andrej Babis rose to power by rejecting the French and German drive to make the currency union the engine of the EU.
Businesspeople worry about the economic costs of forgoing a seat at the table.
“We should take our EU membership, and EU affairs in general, very seriously,” Radek Spicar, vice president of the Confederation of Industry and Transport, a lobby group representing 11,000 Czech companies, told a business forum in Prague on Nov. 22.
“If you’re so vitally dependent on something it’s good to be able to have maximum influence over it,” he said.
Given how heavily the three countries rely on the EU for exports, foreign investment and subsidies, there is good reason to be nervous, especially against the backdrop of Brexit.
Without the anchor of euro membership, some companies fret that the deepening wedge between their governments and the EU will leave the nations with less clout in making decisions that affect their economies.
This risk is becoming more pronounced as the 19 nations in the bloc prepare to lay the foundations for a more complete financial and economic union, including possibly a eurozone finance minister, a budget and a monetary fund.
Poland — the EU’s biggest eastern member and largest net recipient of its subsidies — needs to have a strong voice in Brussels as this unfolds, Belka said on a panel about the future of the euro hosted by business group Lewiatan, which represents 4,100 companies.
He said adopting the single currency would lower corporate financing costs, prod businesses to boost their competitiveness and drive up wages.
“Joining the euro would trigger an innovation drive on a mass scale,” said Belka, who also happens to be a former IMF managing director.
A fellow panelist, Polish Deputy Minister of Finance Leszek Skiba, argued Poland is better off waiting until after the euro-area reform to make any decisions — a view common among the region’s populist politicians and their voters.
Like Babis, a Slovak-born billionaire who controls an agriculture and media conglomerate, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban and former Polish prime minister Jaroslaw Kaczynski oppose yielding any more national sovereignty to the EU. They have refused to set target dates for euro adoption, a condition of membership when the countries joined in 2004.
Their hesitation partly stems from the economic crises that drove the euro to its breaking point in the past decade. They do not want to be liable for bailing out countries like Greece, especially since they are less indebted than many euro members.
Having independent currencies also serves them well during crises because they can weaken them to improve export competitiveness — something Italy and Spain cannot do.
Beyond that, though, is the virulent isolationism and anti-immigrant sentiment that has swept through parts of the EU’s east.
Two out of every 10 Czechs favor joining the euro, while only a third say being an EU member is a “good thing,” according to Eurobarometer surveys this year.
That is worse than how Britons feel about the bloc.
While the EU itself remains popular in Hungary and Poland, only 43 percent of Poles want to adopt the euro. Almost six out of every 10 Hungarians favor a switch away from the forint.
If Brexit showed business leaders anything, it is that their interests can quickly be sidelined when emotions run high over issues like migration and, in Poland and Hungary, rule of law.
In June, the EU launched legal proceedings against the three states for refusing to accept refugees. Poland’s ruling Law and Justice party is at loggerheads with the EU over its push to bring courts and state media under more direct government control.
“Euro adoption is so demonized right now that it’s hard to expect a move,” said Marcin Czyczerski, chief financial officer of Poland’s biggest shoemaker, CCC SA, which has a lot of customers in Europe and even pays for rents at home in the single currency.
Czyczerski and other executives want the euro to mitigate currency risks that are inevitable when a lot of operational costs are in local currencies and revenue in euros.
They are also faced with losing competitiveness to neighbors along the eastern front — namely Slovakia, Slovenia, Lithuania, Estonia and Latvia — that have already switched. Popular approval ratings for the common currency are around 75 percent in these places.
“If Babis was solely a businessman, he’d be on the side of supporting the euro,” said Milan Pasmik, chairman of McCarter AS, a Slovak company that sells its high-end fitness drinks across central Europe and invoices suppliers and buyers in Hungary and Poland in the single currency.
“People who usually talk like that don’t have companies to run. It’s politics,” he said.
Some executives say politicians are more willing to join the euro than they would like to let on.
When push comes to shove, Hungary will not be left out of deeper integration, according to Sandor Csanyi, the country’s richest man and chief executive officer of its biggest lender, OTP Bank.
Businesses have been quietly preparing for that to happen. Czech companies more than doubled the use of the single currency to pay local suppliers in the past five years to 18 percent, central bank data show. Most big property deals in Poland are already done in euros.
“We’ve already had to learn to live with it; we’ve already been preparing our accounts in euros for years,’’ said Barna Erdelyi, chief financial officer of Hungarian truck operator Waberer’s International Nyrt.
Apart from the economic rationale, Spicar said refusing to join the “exclusive eurozone club” when the Czech Republic sends 84 percent of exports to the EU would be a costly mistake politically, too.
“A new core seems to be crystallizing within the EU of countries that are more willing to further integrate, that are more active and less euroskeptic,” he said. “We need to keep careful watch and make sure we don’t miss the train.”
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers