Over the past year, Cambodia’s ruling party, the Cambodian People’s Party (CPP), has dramatically increased its pressure on its political opponents and civil society. Democracy in Cambodia has always been fraught, and elections are not completely free and fair. However, the current crackdown is much greater in scope, and far more concerning, in part because it is being enabled by apathy from the US.
Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen, East Asia’s longest-serving non-royal ruler, has used his power to silence critics and close outspoken media outlets, including one independent newspaper, the Cambodia Daily.
The CPP has also expelled the National Democratic Institute, a US-based non-profit that focuses on rights and democracy, and detained political challengers.
Kem Sokha, who co-headed the main opposition group, the Cambodia National Rescue Party (CNRP), was arrested in September on dubious treason charges. The other main opposition figure, Sam Rainsy, remains in exile in France.
In recent weeks, Hun Sen has increased the pressure, essentially ending Cambodia’s shaky attempts at democracy.
Earlier this month, a court dominated by CPP allies dissolved the CNRP. As a result, the party will most likely be unable to contest national elections next year, all but ensuring that Hun Sen will win another term as prime minister.
The ruling could also help enable Hun Sen to eventually hand power to another family member.
Fearing for their lives, about half of the CNRP members have left Cambodia.
Hun Sen has hardly been shy about his slide toward what the Cambodia Daily, on its last day of publishing, termed a “descent into outright dictatorship.” In fact, Hun Sen, like other Southeast Asian autocrats, now seems to believe that he has political carte blanche, given the low priority that US President Donald Trump has placed on human rights.
In the past, Western pressure had managed to keep Hun Sen in check. Foreign aid, including from the US, accounts for as much as 40 percent of Cambodia’s national budget. While former US president Barack Obama’s administration did expand cooperation with Cambodia, it also repeatedly raised the issue of human-rights abuses with Hun Sen, including during a tense visit by Obama to Phnom Penh in 2012.
The Trump administration has rolled back this pressure, and then some, by downplaying human rights and democracy promotion. In an address to the UN General Assembly in September, Trump made clear that his priority would be sovereignty rather than rights.
Meanwhile, US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson has even reportedly considered removing democracy promotion from the US Department of State’s mission.
Hun Sen recognized this shift almost immediately. In February, he compared his disdain for Cambodia’s media with Trump’s distrust of the mainstream media in the US.
While lower-ranking US officials, including National Security Council Senior Director for Asian Affairs Matthew Pottinger, have met with their Cambodian counterparts to press them on rights issues, Trump has said nothing negative about Hun Sen’s actions.
In a speech in early last month, Hun Sen essentially praised Trump for his indifference and non-interventionism.
Other Southeast Asian autocrats, or elected leaders with autocratic tendencies, have also celebrated the arrival of Trump’s “America First” foreign policy.
Thai Prime Minister Prayuth Chan-ocha, who led a coup against an elected government three years ago, was welcomed at the White House this year. So was Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak, whose wealth might be questioned by the US Department of Justice as part of a wide-ranging investigation into fraud at a Malaysian sovereign wealth fund.
Meanwhile, Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte held a friendly telephone call with Trump in April. Trump praised the Philippine leader for his brutal, lawless “war on drugs,” in which, according to Human Rights Watch, more than 12,000 people have died.
During Trump’s visit to Manila last month, Duterte serenaded him with a song, and then Trump laughed when, in a joint appearance, his counterpart blasted the media, calling them “spies.”
The Philippines is one of the most dangerous countries in the world to be a journalist, according to the Committee to Protect Journalists.
Trump later claimed he briefly mentioned human rights to Duterte, but a Philippine government spokesperson said the two had not discussed rights issues.
As Hun Sen, Duterte and others have shown, the new US approach fosters impunity for autocratic leaders.
Although other donor countries, such as Canada and France, have at times spoken out against Hun Sen’s abuses, the US government, as the actor wielding the most leverage, has historically led the charge.
However, the Trump administration’s see-no-evil approach hinders other countries’ ability to promote rights and democracy.
For example, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, in his own bilateral meeting with Duterte last month, did raise concerns about the drug war in the Philippines. Yet, without US support, Trudeau’s pressure lacked credible measures.
Trump’s policies are placing the US’ long-term interests at risk. As in Cambodia, many of Asia’s strongest supporters of democratic change are young men and women. Opposition parties in Malaysia, Cambodia and other Southeast Asian countries attract a high share of young people, as do many of the media organizations and civil-society groups now under pressure.
Most importantly, from the standpoint of national interest, the US has built its strongest partnerships in Asia with other democracies.
Policies that ignore human rights and democracy will not benefit the US or the region. An “America First” approach that disregards these issues — in Cambodia or elsewhere — will only leave the US weaker in the end.
Joshua Kurlantzick is a senior fellow for Southeast Asia at the Council on Foreign Relations.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers