With autonomous cars and factories already a reality, it seems that unstaffed stores will inevitably be a part of Taiwan’s future. This week, President Chain Store Corp, which runs 7-Eleven, announced that it would be opening cashier-free stores as early as the first half of next year.
The process is not as easy as it sounds — mention unstaffed stores and shoplifting immediately comes to mind. Banking on people’s honesty can only be conducted as a social experiment and not a corporate venture, as evidenced by the case of an “honesty store” in Taipei that suffered major losses earlier this year due to theft.
This is where technology comes into play to track items and ensure people pay before they leave. However, Amazon.com’s cashier-free venture in Seattle is more than 10 months past its scheduled opening due to technical issues. There have been successful cases in China, but most are still in the experimental phase and are not without glitches.
President Chain Store cited the stores as a way to deal with a projected labor shortage. This does not mean eliminating all staff — there will still need to be people to stock shelves, clean up messes, identify damaged or expired goods and deal with unruly customers. How much money it can save remains to be determined, but will the firm lower the cost of its products or raise the pay of its remaining employees, or will it gobble up all the extra profits? Maybe that should not be a question at all.
Some like to cite increasing wages and labor laws for the creation of unstaffed stores — but that really is not valid, because Taiwanese salaries are still painfully low in relation to the cost of living in big cities. More money means more purchasing power, which benefits the stores in the long run — it just seems that nobody thinks this way here.
One benefit for employees is that instead of performing mostly mindless work, they get to learn and operate a new system and use technology that could be the norm in the future. They will have to think about the bigger picture instead of their individual tasks, and learn how to balance human and machine tasks even further than what they are doing today. However, this is only if the company is willing to train those willing to learn. Perhaps those in traditional shops who want to learn can swap places with those in automated stores who do not — but there will inevitably be some who fall through the cracks.
For customers, the appeal of these stores is likely to be the elimination of waiting for cashiers. At a time when everything needs to be instantaneous, this is sure to be a hit with the extremely impatient crowd. Some might lament the loss of face-to-face service — but these days, who stops to chat with the cashier? Most are reduced to item-scanning robots when they operate the cash register. With staff freed from cashier duty, they might even have more opportunities to find other ways to interact with customers.
It really depends on the technology and how firms plan to make this work — perhaps it will have to be a Costco-type establishment where only verified members are allowed inside. Potential hassles will be having to sign in and needing to have a smartphone at all times. What about older people who do not know how to use smartphones? Even if shoplifting is eliminated, people might vandalize the store or mess with shelves. There seem to be more questions than answers.
However, it is a worthwhile experiment. With the sheer density of convenience stores, grocery stores and mom-and-pop shops in Taiwan, it would not hurt to convert some to give people different options and experiences. After all, if a consumer does not like an unstaffed store, they can most likely find another store within walking distance. This is still a novelty and who knows if automated stores will become the norm?
Do not panic just yet — unstaffed stores are not taking over any time soon, and when they do, you might be used to them already.
Elbridge Colby, America’s Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, is the most influential voice on defense strategy in the Second Trump Administration. For insight into his thinking, one could do no better than read his thoughts on the defense of Taiwan which he gathered in a book he wrote in 2021. The Strategy of Denial, is his contemplation of China’s rising hegemony in Asia and on how to deter China from invading Taiwan. Allowing China to absorb Taiwan, he wrote, would open the entire Indo-Pacific region to Chinese preeminence and result in a power transition that would place America’s prosperity
A few weeks ago in Kaohsiung, tech mogul turned political pundit Robert Tsao (曹興誠) joined Western Washington University professor Chen Shih-fen (陳時奮) for a public forum in support of Taiwan’s recall campaign. Kaohsiung, already the most Taiwanese independence-minded city in Taiwan, was not in need of a recall. So Chen took a different approach: He made the case that unification with China would be too expensive to work. The argument was unusual. Most of the time, we hear that Taiwan should remain free out of respect for democracy and self-determination, but cost? That is not part of the usual script, and
All 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers and suspended Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安), formerly of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), survived recall elections against them on Saturday, in a massive loss to the unprecedented mass recall movement, as well as to the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) that backed it. The outcome has surprised many, as most analysts expected that at least a few legislators would be ousted. Over the past few months, dedicated and passionate civic groups gathered more than 1 million signatures to recall KMT lawmakers, an extraordinary achievement that many believed would be enough to remove at
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
RSS