US President Donald Trump arrived in China on Wednesday. This is the leg of his Asia trip that has attracted the most attention.
As White House National Trade Council Director Peter Navarro, a “China expert” who is anti-Beijing, was forced to be absent from the trip and Trump has not built a strong team to deal with China affairs, the rest of the world had been worried about how his visit would go.
The latest Time magazine cover features the words “China won,” in both English and simplified Chinese.
Meanwhile, China had intentionally curried favor with Trump so that he would be overwhelmed and forget to uphold US principles.
When then-US president Ronald Reagan visited China in 1984, the Chinese authorities gave him an “emperor’s dream” by letting him sleep on an emperor’s “dragon bed.” This time, they treated Trump with an extremely luxurious “emperor’s banquet” at the Palace Museum in Beijing.
Unlike all the previous visits, the two nations’ top aides did not reach a number of consensuses before the trip; they merely followed customs. As a result, what problems might arise during the process was unpredictable. Both sides faced a real test.
Still, it was reassuring to see that the US launched its new “Indo-Pacific tactic” before Trump’s Asia trip. Originally, the Asia-Pacific countries were anxious as he failed to reiterate former US president Barack Obama’s “Asia pivot” policy. Now, the scope of the Indo-Pacific tactic is even larger, and the term itself sounds more scientific, not to mention that it actually covers the second half of China’s “One Belt, One Road” project.
The new strategy originated from Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s idea of a “diamond tactic” based on a diamond-shaped alliance of the four major democracies in the Indo-Pacific region — the US, Japan, India and Australia.
While the US tactic highlights the solidity of US-Japan relations, Taiwan can also benefit from the tactic, as it is in line with the nation’s New Southbound Policy. The US’ new tactic might even replace the Trans-Pacific Partnership agreement from which Washington has already withdrawn.
As the name implies, the scope of the Indo-Pacific tactic includes other countries bordering the Indian Ocean apart from India, such as Myanmar, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and the Maldives, as well as those bordering the Arabian Sea and the coastal countries of East Africa.
China has built ports on the Indian Ocean in Myanmar and Pakistan, and it owns a military port stationed with Chinese troops in Djibouti in East Africa. As a result, tensions are expected to rise in the Indian Ocean region.
Moreover, the term “Indo” in this context overlaps Indonesia and the Indochinese peninsula, including Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos. This gives the name a special meaning, as the total population of those countries is higher than that of China.
Within the scope of the new tactic, the friendship of India, Vietnam and Russia has lasted for more than half a century, and all three are facing the threat of the expansion of a greater Chinese empire.
The US should promptly clarify Trump’s role in the alleged “Russiagate” scandal and improve US-Russia relations, while convincing its European allies to accept this. By doing so, it would be able to deal with the “red peril” that threatens world peace and universal values.
If Trump wants to make America great again, this is how he can do it.
Paul Lin is a senior commentator.
Translated by Eddy Chang
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
Xiaomi Corp founder Lei Jun (雷軍) on May 22 made a high-profile announcement, giving online viewers a sneak peek at the company’s first 3-nanometer mobile processor — the Xring O1 chip — and saying it is a breakthrough in China’s chip design history. Although Xiaomi might be capable of designing chips, it lacks the ability to manufacture them. No matter how beautifully planned the blueprints are, if they cannot be mass-produced, they are nothing more than drawings on paper. The truth is that China’s chipmaking efforts are still heavily reliant on the free world — particularly on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
On May 13, the Legislative Yuan passed an amendment to Article 6 of the Nuclear Reactor Facilities Regulation Act (核子反應器設施管制法) that would extend the life of nuclear reactors from 40 to 60 years, thereby providing a legal basis for the extension or reactivation of nuclear power plants. On May 20, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) legislators used their numerical advantage to pass the TPP caucus’ proposal for a public referendum that would determine whether the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant should resume operations, provided it is deemed safe by the authorities. The Central Election Commission (CEC) has
RSS