Third graders might have difficulty with multiplication and division, but they can cope with addition and subtraction of large figures. They might have difficulty extrapolating economic or climate change trends, but they will not find extrapolation of population size challenging.
The population in 20 years can be predicted from the number of births this year: Those turning 20 now were born 20 years ago. If too few people were born then, this year the nation will experience a shortage of students and workers. There will be no turning the clock back to encourage people to churn out babies for the nation.
Taiwan’s low birth rate has long been a matter of debate. The number of births fell from 247,000 in 2002 to 227,000 in 2003, hung at about the 190,000 to 200,000 mark for a while and dipped to 167,000 in 2009.
The percentage of middle-aged and elderly people increasing relative to other age groups has meant a corresponding increase in the death rate. Unless the birth rate goes up, the number of deaths per year in seven or eight years will exceed the number of births, and Taiwan’s population will start to shrink.
In 2012, I forecast that if the trends of low rates of birth, marriage and raising kids continued, the population would decline, which would hurt the property market. I was accused of propagating alarmist rhetoric.
However, we are already seeing this happening — at an accelerating rate — outside the more desirable neighborhoods.
This year, the number of births is set to be as low as 200,000. The ramifications of this will be felt in 18 years, when only 200,000 people — and presumably less than 100,000 males — will turn 18. These, minus the less able-bodied, will number from 170,000 to 180,000 in total over two years of military service.
The Ministry of National Defense says it needs 175,000 soldiers, meaning that male conscription alone will be insufficient to fill the ranks. How is the shortfall to be made up?
Only 167,000 Taiwanese — and only 83,000 males — were born in 2009. They will reach 18 in 2027. At that point, university recruitment and military conscription will hit a major crisis.
Some have suggested moving from a division of labor along gender lines; for example, from women responsible for childcare while the dangerous jobs are left for men to a kind of “gender equality” in which both men and women do military service, road maintenance, construction work and firefighting. The alternative would be spending money importing manual labor.
The math is something third graders could manage, and yet senior officials are unable or unwilling to work this out. Fully cognizant of the seriousness of the situation, ministers of education have continued to try to boost the number of universities.
Another idea is social — as opposed to military — conscription, recruiting women to look after children. People do not react too well to suggestions that everyone should spend their time and money helping raise the next generation, saying such proposals entail forcing women against their will. Remember that compulsory service has been expected of men for decades.
It is just a case of do not ask me to do anything to help; I am too busy. Or, do not ask for money, I do not have enough for myself. The government, employers and the wealthy will never run out of excuses. After all, it will no longer be their problem in 10 or 20 years.
More universities and buildings can be built, but these are going to become little more than breeding grounds for mosquitoes. People aged 40 or 50 now will live another three or four decades; those aged 20 another six. These are the people that are going to have to deal with today’s failure to address the problem.
Yaung Chih-liang is a former minister of health and welfare.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US