Speaking at a forum at National Taiwan University on Monday, Michael Shellenberger, president of the US-based group Environmental Progress, explained why he thought the government’s plan to phase out nuclear power in Taiwan is misguided.
Nuclear power is clean and emits far fewer greenhouse gases than coal-fired or other traditional power plants. Unlike renewable energy, such as solar or wind power, it generates consistent levels of power around the clock, regardless of weather conditions.
It has large energy-generation capacity — capable of meeting industrial, manufacturing and urban needs — and relatively low operating costs.
Taiwan already has four nuclear power plants, three of which are operational with another one virtually ready, although never commissioned.
However, nuclear power carries significant risks in case of accidents, in addition to questions over sourcing uranium and disposing of nuclear waste.
For many Asian nations — as Japan discovered with the 2011 Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant disaster — it is the risk of a major earthquake that should give any government wanting to pursue a nuclear power policy pause for thought.
Thirty-one nations operate nuclear power plants. According to last year’s International Energy Agency report, titled Key World Energy Statistics, almost 11 percent of electricity produced worldwide is from nuclear power. France produces 72.3 percent of its electricity from nuclear power, Ukraine 52.3 percent and the UK 20.4 percent. However, these nations are not regularly hit by earthquakes — unlike Taiwan or South Korea.
Taiwan relies on nuclear power for 13.7 percent of its energy. South Korea, which produces about 30 percent of its electricity from nuclear power and until recently had ambitions to double that percentage by 2035, is the only non-European nation with a nuclear power share of more than 20 percent.
South Korean President Moon Jae-in over the weekend reiterated his plans to phase out nuclear energy by 2060, despite a public opinion survey a few days earlier showing overwhelming support for continuing a nuclear policy.
Taiwan is also committed to phasing out nuclear power.
President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) administration aims to phase out nuclear power by 2025, and to produce 50 percent of electricity from natural gas, 20 percent from renewable sources and 30 percent from coal.
The risks of continuing to operate nuclear power plants far outweigh the benefits. Two of the nation’s three operational plants are in the densely populated north, as is the fourth, non-commissioned one.
Shellenberger’s argument that none of the thousands of deaths caused by the earthquake and the following tsunami in Japan in 2011 were directly caused by radiation leaks would do little to assuage concerns over nuclear power.
However, something will have to fill the gap. It would be good if this could be renewable energy.
During the International Symposium on Sustainability Science on Sunday, Tsai and Vice Minister of Economic Affairs Yang Wei-fu (楊偉甫) talked about the government’s plans to reduce reliance on fossil fuels, to install desulfurization facilities at coal-fired and gas-fired power plants, and to attract investment for renewable energy projects, but it is expected to be a great challenge.
Vice President Chen Chien-jen’s (陳建仁) remark at an environmental forum on Sunday that Taiwan could phase out coal power by 2050 was probably impossibly ambitious and unhelpful.
Nuclear power is a clean option, but it is only suitable for more seismically stable areas. The nation is moving away from nuclear power toward renewables, but it will take more than good intentions and wishful thinking to achieve.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US