As a child during Ethiopia’s deadly famine of 1984, Addis Ababa University geology professor Asfawossen Kassaye remembers watching people from the countryside flock to his town, desperately looking for food after a drought devastated their fields.
He knows first-hand how much damage climate change has done to East Africa, where scientists have said it is making droughts worse, longer and more frequent, putting millions at risk of hunger.
“Climate change is something that is part of the life of the people there” Kassaye said at this year’s Climate Engineering Conference in Berlin.
Illustration: Mountain People
The growing risks are driving a small, but increasingly vocal group of researchers to explore using technology to reduce the threats, in essence by re-engineering the climate.
Such “geoengineering” proposals include large-scale, controversial projects that aim to dim sunlight or capture carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.
The proposals — some of which sound like science fiction — are for the most part still in early stages of testing, but campaigners say poor countries might, once again, suffer the most devastating consequences if some of the technologies are used.
Poor countries have disproportionately born the brunt of climate change even as they had little to do with causing it. In 2015, the US alone emitted more planet-warming carbon dioxide than the African continent’s 54 countries.
The build-up of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere has driven unusual and extreme weather linked to climate change across the globe, bringing record floods and droughts, and more severe storms.
However, poor countries have suffered the most serious economic damage and loss of lives, in part because they have limited resources to prepare for and cope with the changes, experts said.
“This is something that we haven’t caused, that we are paying a bigger price for,” Kassaye told reporters at the conference.
UNCLEAR EFFECTS
The question scientists are now trying to answer is: Could geoengineering methods leave people in poor, climate-vulnerable countries better off than unabated climate change?
“What the African farmer wants to know is if there will be rain next year, if that rain is going to come at a predictable time and if it’s going to be enough for the crops,” Kassaye said.
Worldwide, rising temperatures are on track to exceed goals set by the 2015 Paris climate agreement to curb greenhouse gas emissions. Those excess emissions are blamed for stoking heatwaves, downpours, more powerful storms and a rise in sea levels.
As a result, research into geoengineering is ramping up and scientists have said that large-scale projects to suck carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere will be needed by the 2030s to hold the line against climate change.
If geoengineering solutions fulfill their promises, they could reduce global warming, limit sea-level rise, and make extreme weather events such as hurricanes and droughts less frequent.
However, there is little research about the potential effects of some of the technologies on poor countries.
For example, some studies have suggested that spraying sun-dimming chemicals into the upper atmosphere could affect global weather patterns and shift monsoons that are vital for millions across Asia and Africa.
“Geoengineering is a humanitarian concern,” said Pablo Suarez, a researcher at the Red Cross Red Crescent Climate Centre, at the conference. “It is not only about degrees Celsius and global temperature. It is about people.”
Other ideas for easing climate effects include planting carbon-absorbing forests across large areas of the world, then harvesting the wood for energy, with the emissions produced pumped into storage underground.
Such a process could suck carbon out of the atmosphere and is likely to feature in an Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report next year.
However, scientists have said planting forests on the scale needed to limit global warming could take up to a third of the land that can be used to grow crops, threatening food security and land rights, particularly of poor people.
DIFFERENT PARAMETERS
Some climate change-related problems also are left unresolved by climate engineering, experts have said.
For example, dimming sunshine to cool the planet would not reduce the buildup of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, something that is making oceans more acidic and threatening sea life that millions rely on for food.
While many scientists have studied the potential for engineering solutions at a global level, models used to predict climate change and weather patterns in the future are not precise enough yet to predict regional changes accurately, experts have said.
Different regions also have different priorities when it comes to fighting climate change. For instance, scientists in East Africa, which often struggles with long droughts, are worried about the impact that efforts to reflect more sunlight away from the planet could have on rainfall.
In the Caribbean, just battered by a series of deadly hurricanes, the focus is on the potential for geoengineering making extreme weather events less — or more — frequent.
South Asian researchers, whose home countries saw more than 1,000 people die this year after the worst flooding in a decade, are interested in the impact of the new technologies on monsoons.
GEOGRAPHIC BIAS
However, those involved in studying geoengineering have predominantly been from rich countries in Europe and North America, rather than from poorer countries.
Last week, a new research fund aimed at scientists from developing countries was launched to help them study the impact of “solar radiation management,” or reflecting away more sunlight, on their regions.
“Developing countries are typically on the frontline of climate change. They are more vulnerable to environmental change — change caused by global warming or by geoengineering,” said Andy Parker, a project manager at the Solar Radiation Management Governance Initiative, which launched the fund.
Voices from poor countries have to be more central to discussions about geoengineering, he added.
“Nobody likes to be a rat in someone else’s laboratory,” Suarez said at the conference. “There is a symbolic difference between [change] happening as a byproduct of people using their cars, heating their homes or chopping their trees versus someone intentionally changing the climate.”
One thing many campaigners and scientists agree on is that they do not know enough about the potential impacts of geoengineering.
However, some fear that pinning hopes on technology to fix the climate is a distraction from making the needed emissions cuts and could divert funding from pressing efforts to adapt to the changes underway.
“To prevent more droughts, you need to think about alternatives, about solving the causes of the problem with agriculture, restoration of forests,” said Silvia Ribeiro, Latin America director at environmental group ETC, which opposes the use of geoengineering technology.
“That doesn’t only provide environmental benefits, it also provides food and employment for many people,” he said.
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused