US President Donald Trump’s administration has vowed to revive the coal industry, challenged climate-change science and blasted renewable energy as expensive and dependent on government subsidies.
And yet the solar power industry is booming across “Trump country,” fueled by falling development costs and those same subsidies, which many Republicans in the US Congress continue to support.
Data provided to reporters by GTM Research, a clean-energy market information firm, shows that eight of the 10 fastest-growing US solar markets between the second quarters of last year and this year were western, midwestern or southern states that voted for Trump, with Alabama and Mississippi topping the list.
Illustration: Yusha
Solar firms are also ramping up investments in these regions, signaling their faith that key renewable energy incentives will remain in place for years to come.
The industry’s sunny outlook illustrates the complexity of “green” power politics in Washington and casts doubt on whether the US administration can boost the coal and nuclear sectors while subsidies continue to fuel the growth of competing wind and solar energy.
CONSERVATIVES
Solar expansion in the middle of the country is offsetting its slowing growth in the maturing California and northeast markets. That marks a big shift for an industry that has historically relied on politically liberal coastal states where renewable energy development is mandated to combat air pollution and climate change.
With falling development costs, solar firms see strong prospects in conservative states with no such mandates.
“Climate change has never come up in any discussion about why we would do a project,” said Matt Beasley, chief marketing officer for Silicon Ranch Corp, a solar developer based in Nashville, Tennessee. “It is always about the economics.”
The estimated costs of solar power generation have dropped 85 percent since 2009, making its unsubsidized cost competitive with natural gas in the sunniest locations, according to a report by asset management firm Lazard.
Still, the sector’s growth continues to rely on public support. The US Congress’ Joint Committee on Taxation earlier this year estimated that solar projects would receive US$12.3 billion in tax breaks between last year and 2020.
Trump has never specifically proposed repealing those incentives, but has expressed skepticism about the viability of solar and wind, calling both “very, very expensive.”
US Secretary of Energy Rick Perry last month called for new rules to subsidize coal and nuclear energy, arguing that the rise of weather-dependent solar and wind power would make the grid less reliable.
This week, US Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt said in a speech in Kentucky that he would scrap incentives for renewable energy firms and let them “stand on their own,” but acknowledged that the decision rests with Congress.
A White House official did not respond to a request for comment and clarification of the US administration’s position on solar subsidies.
However, other Republicans are outspoken in their continuing support for the incentives, using an economic rather than environmental rationale.
“The expansion of solar and other clean technologies has created thousands of jobs and reduced emissions,” said US Senator Richard Burr, a Republican who represents North Carolina. “Once these technologies have reached a competitive position in the energy market, a gradual reduction in incentives is an appropriate way to approach their sustained growth.”
Of the 10 states that installed the largest solar power generation capacity over the past year, six were Republican-led, according to the GTM Research data.
Of those, Utah, North Carolina and Texas each installed more than 1 gigawatts of solar energy, or enough to power about 700,000 homes.
Industry players hope solar growth in states that form Trump’s political base will influence how he decides later this year in a trade case they fear could lead to tariffs on solar panels imported to the US.
PHASE-OUT
Solar and wind energy firms have become important constituents in some Republican-led states because they employ about 300,000 people nationwide — six times the number working in the coal industry, according to industry and government data.
In 2015, a Republican-controlled Congress extended lucrative tax credits for renewable energy industries through 2020, most importantly a tax credit worth 30 percent of the cost of residential and utility-scale installations.
Under the law, the solar credits would phase out gradually, ending at a permanent 10 percent for utility projects after 2021. The residential credit would expire.
Solar firms expect that, by then, they can bring down costs enough to compete without government help.
Solar providers in rural states have also gotten a boost from a pair of other federal programs.
One is a US Department of Agriculture program ushered in by former US president Barack Obama, which provided more than US$400 million in funding for rural solar projects in 2015 and last year. Seventy percent of the money went to states that voted for Trump.
The other is the federal Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act, a 40-year-old law requiring utilities to buy renewable power from small providers if their prices are competitive with fossil fuels — something solar developers have only recently been able to offer.
The growth of solar directly undermines Trump’s goal of boosting the coal industry.
US National Mining Association spokesman Luke Popovich called Republican support of solar subsidies “inconsistent with market-based energy policy.”
“Solar is a competitor — and a handsomely subsidized one, along with wind,” he said.
US House of Representatives Republican Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy has supported such incentives, but said clean power firms should soon start fending for themselves.
“It’s not a level playing field,” McCarthy said in an interview. “So you will see those [subsidies] beginning to phase out.”
Beyond subsidy politics, solar developers’ confidence in red-state markets reflects strong demand from utilities there.
When Reuters surveyed 32 utilities with operations in politically conservative states earlier this year, they overwhelmingly rejected making new investments in coal-fired power, despite Trump’s pro-coal agenda — citing falling costs of renewable energy as a factor.
DOING THE MATH
In one example last month, Ameren Corp’s coal-dependent Missouri utility said it would add 100 megawatts of solar in the next decade.
One installer benefitting from solar’s geographic shift is Inovateus Solar LLC, based in South Bend, Indiana. Eighty percent of its planned project pipeline is in either its home state or neighboring Michigan.
“A red state like Indiana has a lot to show the current administration on how solar energy is valuable and economical,” Inovateus chief executive TJ Kanczuzewski said.
Vermont-based groSolar, a subsidiary of France’s EDF, just opened a Minnesota office and called the midwest its “number one priority” for future development.
“There’s been a groundswell of interest and curiosity from utilities,” Kanczuzewski said. “We’re anxious to fill that need.”
Meanwhile, Coronal Energy, a California developer backed by Panasonic, is targeting electric cooperatives, many of which are in rural states, chief commercial officer Danny Van Clief said.
Solar capacity at co-ops, which are not-for-profit utilities owned by their customers, has tripled in the past three years, according to the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association.
Texas, where Perry was once governor, is expected to be the second-biggest state for solar growth over the next five years, according to the Solar Energy Industries Association, largely because of demand from electric cooperatives and municipal utilities, according to Colin Smith of GTM Research.
The wide open spaces of Texas and other states where solar is growing offer cheaper real estate and easier permitting for solar installations than the industry’s traditional markets in densely populated coastal cities, Silicon Ranch cofounder Reagan Farr said.
“The math works quite well,” he said.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers