The steady drip, drip, drip coming from Hong Kong these days is the sound of the territory’s cherished liberties and freedoms slowly leaking away from multiple taps.
There was a lot of optimism when the Sino-British Joint Declaration on the Question of Hong Kong was signed in December 1984, promising that China’s socialist system and policies “shall not be practiced” in the territory and that its capitalist system and lifestyle “shall remain unchanged for 50 years.”
Between the signing in 1984, China’s National People’s Congress adopting the declaration in April 1990 and the Basic Law taking effect on July 1, 1997, doubts arose as to whether Beijing was able or willing to live up to its agreements — an occasional drip, so to speak.
However, since Xi Jinping (習近平) took over as Chinese Communist Party secretary-general in November 2012 and became president in March 2013, the occasional drips have become steady leaks.
The promise of universal suffrage sprang a leak in mid-2014 when it became clear that any offer by Beijing would fall far short of a free choice of candidates and one person, one vote.
Press freedom, which was already under threat from self-censorship and loss of advertising revenue, is also leaking, as evidenced by the violent threats in 2013 against Next Media founder Jimmy Lai (黎智英); the sacking of the chief editor of the Chinese-language Ming Pao in January 2014, followed by a stabbing the following month that put him in hospital; the firebombing of Lai’s home and office in January 2015; the abduction and detentions of five men linked to a Hong Kong publishing house and bookstore from October to December that year; and the firing of another Ming Pao editor last year, to name but a few.
Judicial independence has sprung a leak, as shown by court rulings last year and this year that disqualified six pro-independence politicians from the Legislative Council, as well as an appeals court decision in August to jail three leaders of the “Umbrella movement” — Joshua Wong (黃之鋒), Alex Chow (周永康) and Nathan Law (羅冠聰) — for six to eight months.
Yesterday, Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam (林鄭月娥) conceded that her administration was abandoning its rights under Article 154 of the Basic Law to control entry and exit into the territory to Beijing.
Asked on radio whether her government might ban more foreign citizens, two days after UK Conservative Party Human Rights Commission founder Benedict Rogers was on Wednesday refused entry, Lam said that Beijing could block anyone it wanted if it considered their presence in the territory a matter for the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Clearly, Beijing’s idea that any criticism of its policies is a threat to national security is being extended to Hong Kong.
Taiwanese who want to visit the territory have known this for a long time. From the refusal of a visa to then-Taipei mayor Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in 2005, reportedly because of his criticism of Beijing’s “Anti-Secession” Law, to the last-minute denials of visas to three people invited to a cross-strait forum, including former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) spokesperson Yang Wei-chung (楊偉中), Taiwanese know a visa for the territory cannot be taken for granted.
Lam, in her first policy address, on Wednesday said that Hong Kongers have a duty to stand up for China and the territory has a “duty to nurture our next generation into citizens with a sense of national identity.”
The trouble for Lam, and Beijing, is that Hong Kongers increasingly appear to want no part of that national identity.
On Tuesday, Hong Kong soccer fans once again jeered as the Chinese national anthem was played before a match. Such jeering has become increasingly frequent since 2014.
Hong Kong’s drips appear to be Beijing’s refinement of traditional Chinese water torture techniques.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US