US President Donald Trump’s administration is nearing completion of new “Buy American” rules to make it easier to sell US-made military drones overseas and compete against fast-growing Chinese and Israeli rivals, senior US officials said.
While Trump’s aides work on relaxing domestic regulations on drone sales to select allies, Washington will also seek to renegotiate a 1987 missile-control pact with the aim of loosening international restrictions on US exports of autonomous aircraft, US government and industry sources said.
The US administration is pressing ahead with its domestic revamp of drone export policy under heavy pressure from US manufacturers and in defiance of human rights advocates who warn of the risk of fueling instability in hot spots including the Middle East and South Asia.
Illustration: Mountain People
The changes, part of a broader effort to overhaul US arms export protocols, could be rolled out by the end of the year under a US presidential policy decree, the administration officials said on condition of anonymity.
The aim is to help US drone makers, pioneers in remote-controlled aircraft that have become a centerpiece of counterterrorism strategy, reassert themselves in the overseas market where China, Israel and others often sell under less-cumbersome restrictions.
Simplified export rules could easily generate thousands of jobs, but it is too early to be more specific, said Remy Nathan, a lobbyist with the Aerospace Industry Association.
The main beneficiaries would be top US drone makers General Atomics, Boeing, Northrop Grumman, Textron and Lockheed Martin.
“This will allow us to get in the game in a way that we’ve never been before,” one senior US official said.
Regulations are expected to be loosened especially on the sale of unarmed intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance drones, the most sophisticated of which carry high-resolution cameras and laser-guided targeting systems to aid missiles fired from warplanes, naval vessels or ground launchers.
However, deliberations have been more complicated on how to alter export rules for missile-equipped drones like the Predator and Reaper. Hunter-killer drones, which have essentially changed the face of modern warfare, are increasingly in demand and US models are considered the most advanced.
The push is not only part of Trump’s “Buy American” agenda to boost US business abroad, but also reflects a more export-friendly approach to weapons sales that the administration sees as a way to wield influence with foreign partners, the senior official said.
Under a draft of the new rules, a classified list of countries numbering in double digits would be given more of a fast-track treatment for military drone purchases, a second senior official said.
The favored group would include some of Washington’s closest NATO allies and partners in the “Five Eyes” intelligence alliance: Britain, Australia, Canada and New Zealand, the industry source said.
Rachel Stohl, director of the conventional defense program at the Stimson Center in Washington, said if US drone export rules become too lenient, they could give more governments with poor human rights records the means to “target their own civilians.”
Former US president Barack Obama revised the policy for military drone exports in 2015, but US manufacturers complained it was still too restrictive compared with main competitors China and Israel.
US drone makers are vying for a larger share of the global military drone market. Even before the coming changes, the Teal Group, a market research firm, has forecast sales will rise from US$2.8 billion this year to US$9.4 billion in 2025.
Linden Blue, chief executive of privately held General Atomics, the US leader in military drones, visited the White House recently to lobby for his industry, a person familiar with the discussions said.
Among the US changes will be a formal reinterpretation of the “presumption of denial,” a longstanding obstacle to most military drones sales, that would make it easier and faster to secure approval, the officials said.
Britain, and only recently Italy, are the only countries that had been allowed to buy armed US drones.
A long-delayed US$2 billion sale to India of General Atomics’ Guardian surveillance drones finally secured US approval in June, but New Delhi’s request for armed drones has stalled.
A major hurdle to expanded sales of the most powerful US drones is the Missile Technology Control Regime, or MTCR, a 1987 accord signed by the US and 34 other countries, which set rules for the sale and purchase of missiles.
It categorizes drones with a range greater than of 300km and a payload of more than 500kg as cruise missiles, requiring extremely tight import/export controls.
To gain an international stamp of approval for the relaxed US export rules, US officials want the MTCR renegotiated.
US Department of State officials attending an annual meeting of the missile-control group in Dublin next week are to present a “discussion paper” proposing that sales of drones — which did not exist when the agreement was created — be treated more leniently than the missile technology that the MTCR was designed to regulate, a US official and industry sources said.
There is no guarantee of a consensus. Russia, which has NATO members along its borders, could resist such changes, the US official said.
China, which is not an MTCR signatory, has pushed ahead with drone sales to some countries with close ties to Washington, such as Iraq, Saudi Arabia and Nigeria, but which have failed to pass US regulatory muster.
Chinese models such as the CH-3 and CH-4 have been compared to the Reaper, but are much cheaper.
US officials said Beijing sells them with few strings attached.
The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs insists it takes a “cautious and responsible attitude” to military drone exports.
Israel, which is outside the MTCR, but has pledged to abide by it, competes with US manufacturers on the basis of high-tech standards.
However, it will not sell to neighbors in the volatile Middle East.
Israel sold US$525 million worth of drones overseas last year, Israeli Ministry of Defense data showed.
US drone makers and their supporters within the administration contend that other countries are going to proliferate drones, so they should not be left behind.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US