The Losheng (Happy Life) Sanatorium for people with Hansen’s disease is a world-class cultural heritage site. It commemorates the nation’s public health history and is a well-preserved urban sanctuary for a neighborhood that is in desperate need of a public space.
In 2002, the construction of a maintenance depot at Huilong Station (迴龍站) for the Xinzhuang Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) Line began, which led to the demolition of a vital entrance to Losheng that was used by people in wheelchairs who have been living in the sanatorium for decades. Despite more than a decade-long social mobilization to reroute the MRT line and restore the heritage site, there is still no agreeable solution to the impasse.
However, recent developments have shed light on the possibility of a win-win solution that would balance the needs of all parties concerned.
For preservation advocates, the bottom line is the humane and just accommodation of the remaining patients who depend on electric scooters for movement in and out of the site and, second, complete conservation of the buildings and the landscape of the site, including the historically significant entrance from the main road, a key requirement of the Cultural Heritage Preservation Act (文化資產保存法).
On the other side, the bottom line is maintaining the standard of operation for the MRT line without compromising safety or delaying trains.
A previous proposal to construct a pedestrian bridge over the tracks to connect Losheng to the main road would require the use of an elevator for scooters to negotiate three floors of height difference between the campus and the main road.
This proposal would greatly inhibit the movement of the patients and also fail to meet the requirements of landscape restoration of the entrance to the site. Alternatively, there has been a proposal to build a large platform over the tracks, but it also does not overcome the vertical transition necessary at the main entrance.
In December last year, at a coordination meeting held at the National Development Council where representatives from all concerned departments were present, a possible solution was raised.
By reducing the size of the tracks closest to the main entrance, it is possible to slope a large platform gradually so that it meets the ground, thus allowing electric scooters to move freely without the use of cumbersome elevators, while at the same time restoring the original features fo the entrance.
This proposal was a major breakthrough, which was also affirmed by Taipei Rapid Transit Corp (TRTC) at the meeting.
However, in a meeting to affirm this important consensus, the Department of Rapid Transit Systems (DORTS) would not agree to the compromise. This was not only a setback for the preservation of one of the most notable heritage sites in the nation, but also made a mockery of the public process of democracy, especially in light of the government’s emphasis on human rights and transitional justice.
DORTS has singlehandedly derailed the long and arduous process of coordination among the concerned departments that led to the compromise solution. The parties concerned are the ministries of culture, transportation and communications, and health and welfare. The local departments include the New Taipei City Cultural Affairs Department, DORTS and TRTC.
A large sloping platform across the tracks is the win-win solution and the central government should affirm this most appropriate proposal. A firm and timely decision must be made now before the construction of the MRT line is completed.
This solution can achieve at least three significant objectives with benefits to all parties.
First, it is the most humane and considerate solution for patients in electric scooters, allowing them the greatest freedom of movement possible. Being possibly the least cared for group in Taiwan, society owes them dignity and respect for the remainder of their harsh lives.
Second, adhering to the Cultural Heritage Preservation Act, the sloping platform provides the best basis for the comprehensive and integral restoration of the entrance to the site. This includes the all-important pattern of the pathways which historically isolated caregiving personnel from leprosy patients, and the tropical palm-tree driveways.
Third, this large entrance, when restored, would become the most important public park in the Huilong area of Sinjhuang District (新莊), not only benefiting local residents, but also providing greater use of the MRT station and thereby contributing to the development of the surrounding area.
John Liu is chair of the Building and Planning Research Foundation at National Taiwan University and OSM distinguished visiting professor at the National University of Singapore.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers