A decade on, Rawda al-Zaanoun is at last willing to forgive the assailants who killed her son during the civil war that split Palestine.
It has been painful, but she said it is time.
“He was hit with a bullet in the back. He was a martyr,” the 54-year-old said at an event in Gaza City to mark the public reconciliation of families of people killed in the war. “The decision was not easy because the blood of our son is precious, but we have given amnesty.”
Her son, Ala, a married father of two and a Palestinian National Security Forces officer, was killed in June 2007 after he rushed out of his house in Gaza City, having heard that his uncle was injured in clashes between rival Palestinian factions Hamas and Fatah.
Since that war a decade ago, Fatah, led by the secular heirs of former president of the Palestinian National Authority Yassir Arafat, has run the West Bank, headed the internationally recognized Palestinian Authority and been responsible for all negotiations with Israel.
Its rivals, the Muslim group Hamas, an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood, drove Fatah out of Gaza City and has run the tiny coastal strip that is home to 2 million people, nearly half of the population of the Palestinian territories.
The schism is to end this week, when Hamas hands over control of Gaza City to a unity government.
Although it agreed to the arrangement three years ago, the decision to implement it now marks a striking reversal for Hamas, which is considered a terrorist group by Israel, the US and most of the most powerful Arab countries.
“Hamas has made big concessions, and every coming concession will be stunning and surprisingly bigger than the one that passed, so that we can conclude reconciliation and this division must end,” Hamas in Gaza City chief Yehya al-Sinwar said during a meeting last week with social media activists.
If Hamas has swallowed a bitter pill by ending the feud, perhaps bitterest of all is the role played by exiled former Gaza City security chief Mohammed Dahlan, once Hamas’ fiercest foe who is now a leading player in regional efforts to pull Gaza City back into the Palestinian mainstream.
Officials on both sides of the Palestinian divide and in other Arab countries say Dahlan, based since 2011 in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), is behind an influx of cash to prop up Gaza City and a detente between Hamas and Arab states, including Egypt.
Dahlan’s return to prominence could have consequences for Palestinian politics as profound as the reconciliation itself.
As hated as he once was in Gaza City for trying to uproot Hamas, he is perhaps even more reviled by the Fatah leadership in Ramallah for challenging the authority of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas.
Ambitious and charismatic, he has long been suspected of harboring designs to succeed Abbas.
Among the initiatives Dahlan has promoted in Gaza City is the reconciliation program of families like the Zaanouns and 19 others, who each accepted a US$50,000 blood money payment from an Egyptian-Emirati charity fund in return for publicly renouncing the demand to avenge the deaths of their sons.
Old wounds will be hard to salve. Activists on both sides hold memories of their enemies shooting out kneecaps or torturing each other in partisan prisons.
Zaanoun said her family took the decision to reconcile, despite their intense grief over the loss of their son, “for the sake of preventing bloodshed, for the sake of blockaded Gaza and for the sake of Palestine.”
Dahlan has raised millions more, financing mass weddings for hundreds of young couples and distributing cash aid for several thousand needy families.
He has also used a close relationship with Egyptian President Abdel-Fattah al-Sisi in particular to regain his influence.
Al-Sisi, who took power by toppling a president from Hamas’ Muslim Brotherhood allies, controls Gaza’s only non-Israeli frontier and the keys to its prosperity.
“Dahlan worked hard, together with his contacts in Egyptian intelligence and sometimes with direct intervention from al-Sisi,” a Gulf source who asked not to be named told reporters.
The strategy might be gaining him goodwill: An opinion poll last week by the West Bank-based Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey showed that those who still support Fatah in Gaza are shifting their loyalty to Dahlan.
His popularity among people living in Gaza City has risen in the past nine months from 9 percent to 23 percent, the survey said.
The handover of Gaza City suggests Dahlan’s allies in Egypt and the UAE realize that any bid to put the Palestinian house in order, for now at least, needs unity.
“Every time anyone speaks to [Israeli Prime Minister Benyamin] Netanyahu, he would say how can you reach a solution when the Palestinians are splintered?” the Gulf source added. “The reconciliation is an effort by several like-minded countries looking for a comprehensive solution.”
Short of funds and friends, Hamas might have few options but to make concessions. For years it had modest, but stable economic backing by Islamist-leaning Turkey and the wealthy Qatar state, where Hamas houses its headquarters.
However, in recent months, its friends, especially Qatar, have been on the back foot.
Egypt, Saudi Arabia and the UAE have imposed an economic and diplomatic boycott on Doha over alleged support of terrorists, including, in their reckoning, Hamas.
Three conflicts with the Jewish state left many civilian neighborhoods in Gaza City pulverized. Rebuilding has been thwarted by the Israeli-Egyptian blockade, which al-Sisi has the power to ease.
Hamas figures blame Abbas, Fatah and Dahlan for encouraging Egypt and other Arab nations to keep the economic pressure on, forcing Hamas to agree to the reconciliation.
“One of our reasons was to spare our people this suffering, which this time was made by Palestinian hands,” Hamas official Sami Abu Zuhri said.
Senior Fatah official Nasser al-Qidwa praised Hamas’ reconciliation moves and chalked up the group’s sudden change of tack to “the governance crisis that Hamas is living through and the crisis of foreign alliances, as well as the difficult conditions of some of Hamas’ traditional allies.”
Imposing its writ over policing Gaza City and its borders will be the main challenge for the non-partisan Cabinet of technocrats as it seeks to make this month’s unity initiative a reality.
Setting out a hard line, Palestinian Prime Minister Rami Hamdallah said in a statement on Tuesday last week that Hamas must eventually cede all “crossings, security and government departments.”
Gaza City bristles with hundreds of rockets belonging to Hamas’ armed wing and the movement insisted that the arsenal it says is essential to confronting Israel will never be given up.
Hamas deputy political chief Musa Abu Marzooq conceded in an interview last month with pan-Arab newspaper al-Hayat that decisions to fight or make peace with Israel should be in future agreed jointly with Fatah.
However, he said the movement would keep its finger on the trigger: “The subject of the resistance’s weapons ... will not be on the table for dialogue.”
Additional reporting by Sami Aboudi and Ali Sawafta
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US