Financial Supervisory Commission Chairman Wellington Koo (顧立雄) is in the spotlight regarding financial regulation as he faces issues such as family-owned businesses, the heavy fine levied by US authorities on Mega Financial Holding Co and SinoPac Financial Holdings Co’s failure to regulate its subsidiaries’ activities.
Financial governance has once again come into focus and there are three areas that require further analysis.
First, Taiwan’s financial industry is said to be dominated by four powerful families and Citibank, although some media commentators say foreign investors are the most influential. Foreign investors own about 27 percent of SinoPac’s shares, nearly 30 percent of Cathay Financial Holding Co and Fubon Financial Holding Co, and 43 percent of CTBC Financial Holding Co. Despite this, most Taiwanese still believe these companies are family-controlled. Why?
Nominally, individual members of these families do not hold a large number of shares, but if legal representatives appointed by investment company X, Y or Z are counted, it would show that these families are able to control most important company decisions, despite holding a minority of the companies’ shares. Families exert a lot of control that needs to be reduced given the high degree of leverage in the financial industry.
Second is the operating problems stemming from the power of privately run financial holding companies extending into state-run banks. As some media commentators have said, the government’s shareholdings are larger than any family’s. However, the tendency of the government to appoint legal representatives based on political “color” rather than merit is no different from how privately run holding companies go about their appointments. The main problem with state-run banks is that they are not focused mainly on performance and many of them rely on government policy.
Third is deciding which is more important: financial supervision or development. Ways to improve profits and operations, and eliminate irregularities are part of what the media call the three new rules for financial supervision, namely: developing financial technology while maintaining a competitive financial industry; implementing differentiated management and improving supervision of the separation between industry and finance; and excessive concentration of financial power in the hands of a few families. This is why financial policy must be both unambiguous and predictable.
There are, generally speaking, two “firewalls” aimed at protecting financial institutions, and they are focused on banks: restricting investment in other financial and in non-financial institutions. The latter addresses the separation of finance and industry as in the SinoPac case and is thus also related to governing the activities of subsidiaries.
However, many financial scandals involved companies setting up banks or financial institutions, which then invest in these companies’ subsidiaries. The latter area — non-financial — is more strictly controlled, although such activities still occur.
Rather than debating which family is more powerful, people should adopt the view that financial governance should be focused not on nominal laws, but on thorough practical controls.
After all, both Mega and SinoPac have issued reports on corporate social responsibility and introduced independent board members and committees required by law, and they are both included in the Corporate Governance 100 Index. Makes one wonder what the problem is, does it not?
Wang Chien-an is an associate professor at National Chi-Nan University’s banking and finance department.
Translated by Edward Jones and Perry Svensson
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US