The meteoric rise of the New Power Party (NPP) on the heels of the 2014 student-led Sunflower movement — arguably one of the major events shaping Taiwan’s current political climate — sparked hopes that the nation was in the process of breaking the shackles of two-party politics and embracing a more vibrant democracy.
Those hopes seem to be on shaky ground, after a survey by the pan-green Taiwanese Public Opinion Foundation released this week found a significant drop in the NPP’s support rating over the past year.
The results have baffled and unsettled many, sowing fears that the NPP, like many smaller parties before it, is likely to become marginalized and irrelevant over time.
The poll found that just 6.4 percent of respondents sided with the NPP, compared with 14.9 percent who did so in July last year.
Meanwhile, support for the nation’s two largest parties has begun to bounce back after some ups and downs over the past year. About 30.2 percent and 18 percent of respondents identified with the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) respectively, whose support rates stood at 30.4 percent and 16 percent respectively in July last year.
However, before jumping to conclusions about the long-term viability of the NPP, it is important to consider why other smaller parties, such as the Taiwan Solidarity Union (TSU) or the New Party, became irrelevant.
During former president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) two terms in office, issues such as independence-unification, country normalization and relations with China played a dominant role in local politics. They were often at the center of election campaigns and of most parties’ concerns.
The global financial crisis that erupted in 2007 and government inefficiency caused by politicians’ emphasis on national identity issues shifted the political climate. The general public, and voters, started to pay more attention to matters more closely related to their lives.
The change forced parties to adapt and evolve to survive, with the KMT putting more emphasis on the economy and the DPP on domestic reform. The TSU and New Party, which continued to focus solely on the independence/unification issue, simply faded from an environment that was already hostile to smaller parties.
Why did voters, especially younger ones, choose the NPP over the TSU in last year’s elections, when the two parties are considered “ultra-green” on the independence-unification spectrum?
The NPP’s association with the Sunflower movement made it more relatable to young voters, but it is its support for progressive social issues to which the younger generation attaches greater importance — the legalization of same-sex marriage, better labor laws, environmental protection and the abolition of the death penalty — might be what was really driving its popularity.
Another finding in the foundation’s survey might also shed some light on what is happening: 38.2 percent of respondents said they did not support a specific party, up from 22.1 percent in July last year. That is higher than the DPP’s latest support rating.
That big jump could indicate that fewer voters are willing to blindly support a party and might switch from one party to another, or to a non-partisan candidate, if a party disappoints them or no longer stands for the values in which they believe.
Taiwan is not sliding back to the era of two-party politics. Instead, its voters appear willing to embrace any party that can better represent their interests.
This might be good news for the nation’s democratic system, but it is not for those parties that have become too complacent to stay in-sync with mainstream values.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
Gogoro Inc was once a rising star and a would-be unicorn in the years prior to its debut on the NASDAQ in 2022, as its environmentally friendly technology and stylish design attracted local young people. The electric scooter and battery swapping services provider is bracing for a major personnel shakeup following the abrupt resignation on Friday of founding chairman Horace Luke (陸學森) as chief executive officer. Luke’s departure indicates that Gogoro is sinking into the trough of unicorn disillusionment, with the company grappling with poor financial performance amid a slowdown in demand at home and setbacks in overseas expansions. About 95