Frank Chen’s e-commerce business has nothing to do with politics, but he worries it might be sunk by the Chinese Communist Party’s latest effort to control what the Chinese public sees online.
Chen’s 25-employee company sells clothes and appliances to Americans and Europeans through platforms including Facebook, one of thousands of Web sites blocked by China’s Web filters. Chen reaches it using a virtual private network (VPN), but that window might be closing after Beijing launched a campaign in January to stamp out use of VPNs to evade its so-called “Great Firewall.”
“Our entire business might be paralyzed,” Chen said by telephone from the western city of Chengdu.
Illustration: Mountain People
Still, “national policy deserves a positive response and we fully support it,” he added later in a text message.
The crackdown threatens to disrupt work and study for millions of Chinese entrepreneurs, scientists and students who rely on Web sites they can see only with a VPN. The technology, developed to create secure, encrypted links between computers, allows Chinese Web users to see a blocked site by hiding the address from government filters.
Chinese astronomers and physicists use services such as Google Scholar and Dropbox, accessible only via VPN, to share research and stay in touch with foreign colleagues.
Merchants use Facebook and other blocked social media to find customers. Students look for material in subjects from history to film editing on YouTube and other blocked sites.
POLITICAL CONTROL
Control over information is especially sensitive ahead of October’s twice-a-decade ruling party congress, at which Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is expected to be named to a second five-year term as leader.
The VPN crackdown is part of a campaign to tighten political control that activists have said is the most severe since the 1989 suppression of the Tiananmen Square pro-democracy movement.
Dozens of activists and lawyers have been detained. A cybersecurity law that took effect in June tightens control on online data. Regulators have stepped up censorship of social media and video Web sites.
How many people might be affected is unclear, but consumer research firm GlobalWebIndex said a survey of Chinese Web users this year found that 14 percent use a VPN daily.
If that percentage holds for China’s total online population of 731 million, it suggests the country might have as many as 100 million regular VPN users.
About 8.8 percent of respondents use VPNs to look at “restricted sites,” GlobalWebIndex said.
That would be equivalent to 65 million people, or the population of Britain.
Chinese leaders encourage Web use for business and education. They want online commerce to help transform China from a low-wage factory into a high-tech consumer society.
However, they reject the notion of a borderless Internet and free flow of information.
Chinese Web users without VPNs cannot see the most popular global Web sites, including Google and social media such as Facebook, Twitter and YouTube, as well as news outlets and human rights groups.
In the latest crackdown, regulators said that only government-authorized VPNs would be allowed.
The operator of a popular service, Green VPN, told customers in June it had been ordered to close. Others shut down without warning.
“You have to leave a window for people, for those who need it,” said Wen Jian, a securities trader in Beijing.
Wen said he needs to find financial information and Google, accessible only with a VPN, is more effective than Chinese search engines.
However, his VPN quit working two months ago.
“As far as I know, some government people use VPNs too,” 27-year-old Wen said. “They read things abroad. Why can they have it and we cannot?”
The crackdown reflects Xi’s notion of “Internet sovereignty,” or Beijing’s absolute right to control what people can do and see online.
Unauthorized VPNs were already banned, but authorities appeared to ignore them, possibly to avoid disrupting business or to defuse resistance among professionals and academics.
Government spokespeople refuse to acknowledge any site is blocked, although researchers have said they can see attempts to reach sites such as Google stopped within servers operated by state-owned China Telecom, which controls China’s links to the global Internet.
Regulators have yet to say who will be allowed to use government-licensed VPNs or what they can see.
However, a letter sent by China Telecom to some corporate customers this year offers a hint: It says VPNs can link only to a company’s headquarters abroad and no other sites. It warns violators would lose access.
INTERNET TAX
Until now, Web controls have acted like a tax, allowing users to see blocked sites by paying for a VPN, said Margaret Roberts, a political scientist at the University of California, San Diego.
“As VPNs become more difficult to access, it’s like the government is raising the tax,” Roberts said in an e-mail. “If VPNs were illegal, we would expect a different calculation for those seeking access.”
In a sign of a more severe official stance, a 26-year-old entrepreneur who sold VPN services in Dongguan, near Hong Kong, was sentenced in March to nine months in prison.
The agency in charge of the crackdown, the Cyberspace Administration of China, and the Chinese State Council’s press office did not respond to questions sent by fax and e-mail about what, if anything, the public would be allowed to do with authorized VPNs.
Chen said he heard private companies might be permitted, but he has yet to apply.
The economic impact is unclear, but other Chinese data controls are already a drag on business.
The European Center for International Political Economy estimated in 2014 that curbs in effect or planned could cut economic growth by up to 1.1 percentage points.
That would be equal to as much as US$130 billion of lost activity in China’s US$12 trillion per year economy.
“I asked some friends, and if a large number of VPNs are banned, then everyone’s response is there will be a big impact on their business,” Chen said.
Chinese leaders faced similar complaints after the Great Firewall was activated in 2002. It blocked access to Google, prompting an outcry from scientists and businesspeople who needed to find research papers and commercial information.
Public complaints have been muted, in part because Chinese companies have developed alternatives to popular global services.
Instead of Facebook and Twitter, Chinese social media users have WeChat and Sina Weibo. Baidu provides Google-style search that complies with official censorship.
“I am pretty lazy,” said Hao Kailin, a landscape designer in Beijing who finds images online for work. “If it is too much trouble to look for pictures from prohibited Web sites, then I give up.”
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US