The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), under which Taiwan was a one-party state for near half a century, is finally in decline — after being routed in the elections it has now been asked to return its ill-gotten party assets, and its cadres who lost power are busy competing for the their piece of the pie.
Old members are revealing the true color of their “bones.” While some are now saying they have “blue [KMT] skin with Taiwanese bones,” an old KMT member who has spent his whole life devoted to fighting the Chinese communists has recently revealed his red (communist) bones, saying that he is no longer anti-communist and vowing to “promote unification” from this point on.
This person, retired army general Hsu Li-nung (許歷農), the spiritual leader of the New Party, is just shy of being a centenarian. The future is not exactly his preserve.
Of course, he is perfectly entitled to choose where he belongs and to seek lack of freedom, but if he wants to drag the younger generation down with him in his quest for unification with China, he is going too far.
The reason Taiwanese and former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and his clan were so vocal about their opposition to communism was that this was the only thing preventing Taiwan from becoming communist.
If the Chinese wished to allow their own country to be communist, that is their business, and they should take responsibility for that. Taiwanese have chosen democracy. Both sides of the Taiwan Strait should accept each other’s decision and try to coexist peacefully.
The people who once used fear and intimidation to bully Taiwanese by shouting about the need to defeat communism used to refer to the Chinese communists as “bandits.”
Now that the rug has been pulled from under their feet, they can no longer rely on the anti-communist struggle to legitimize themselves.
With the infusion of capitalist principles in the Chinese economy — what former Chinese paramount leader Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平) called “socialism with Chinese characteristics” — they can no longer claim to be that different from the Chinese “communists,” who they themselves admit are not really so communist anymore.
Not so communist perhaps, but the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) continues to deepen its oppressive authoritarian hold over China.
Old people may pretend to be forgetful. The KMT party-state framed its goal of “retaking mainland China through military action” as a fight against the “communist bandits,” and used this as an excuse to implement martial law and dictatorship.
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and his supporters attempted to restore the party-state, but he did not explicitly promote unification. Now Ma’s “red bones” and selfish motives have been revealed.
Former legislative speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) was criticized by KMT fundamentalists for having “blue skin and green bones.”
Once nearly expelled from the KMT, he has started spouting nonsense since Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) became chairman, denying that he has “blue skin and green bones,” and saying he has “blue skin and Taiwanese bones” instead.
Whatever, somewhere in all of this he is revealing at least some degree of duplicity.
When Taiwan was under the party-state dictatorship, it was excusable for some people to try to cover their Taiwanese bones with blue skin in order to survive.
However, after Taiwan’s democratization, they should have shed those newly redundant blue skins. Honesty and authenticity would have been preferable.
James Wang is a media commentator.
Translated by Lin Lee-Kai
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
The war between Israel and Iran offers far-reaching strategic lessons, not only for the Middle East, but also for East Asia, particularly Taiwan. As tensions rise across both regions, the behavior of global powers, especially the US under the US President Donald Trump, signals how alliances, deterrence and rapid military mobilization could shape the outcomes of future conflicts. For Taiwan, facing increasing pressure and aggression from China, these lessons are both urgent and actionable. One of the most notable features of the Israel-Iran war was the prompt and decisive intervention of the US. Although the Trump administration is often portrayed as
RSS