The salaries of the nation’s professors fall well below those in neighboring nations, while the government’s controversial reforms have cut pensions for civil servants, public-school teachers and the military.
Consequently, Taiwan is facing a higher education crisis.
Not that government ministers are indifferent to the problem: The government’s educational incentive plan, called the “Yushan Project” — which aims to raise salaries of top academics — reflects officials’ concern over the “brain drain” problem in higher education.
The government hopes the policy would placate increasingly anxious teachers while stemming the outflow of high-level talent.
Will the plan work, or will it — as some commentators are predicting — simply hasten the collapse of higher education?
The Yushan Project comprises two components: First, it provides funding for 500 “Yushan Scholars,” who are to receive an annual salary starting at NT$6 million (US$198,965). Second, professors engaged in academic research at public universities are to receive an additional monthly allowance of NT$5,445.
As the average worker in Taiwan struggles to put food on the table, teachers’ complaints might appear somewhat crass.
However, because the government has cut teachers’ pension payments — including for those already in retirement living off their retirement income — working teachers must expend significant time and effort increasing their savings, managing investments and perhaps working a second job.
Most university teachers do not come from wealthy families and few benefit from an inheritance. The pension cut will therefore have a serious effect on the quality of teachers and academic research.
To make ends meet, only those with a passion for their subject will choose to pursue a career in teaching and research. The effect this could have on the quality of these fields is worrying.
Only raising the research allowance for professors will not solve the crisis. The correct approach is to substantially raise the salaries of all university teachers, including those at private institutions. This would somewhat offset the pension reductions.
Moreover, adding only a meager NT$5,445 per month to teachers’ salaries is an idiotic policy.
From the teachers’ perspective, the increase provides little real benefit. Since the sum would be given as an allowance and not added to their basic salaries, their pensions will not benefit. An additional NT$5,000 a month works out to NT$60,000 per annum, or NT$900,000 over 15 years — not enough to serve as a relief fund, let alone boost morale.
The annual starting salary of NT$6 million being offered to 500 academics is also problematic.
The Ministry of Education has said that the nation’s top academic institutions are to propose nominees, who are to be reviewed by a national inter-departmental committee.
Why are academic institutions not trusted to nominate these academics and then apply for funding made available by the government, like a regular scholarship program? All the ministry would need to do is make regular checks.
Furthermore, the committee seems obsessed with “linking industry with academia.” Such thinking has been disastrous for academia as the humanities are invariably overlooked.
If the ministry insists on advancing the project, university teachers will continue to be filled with pessimism and higher education will suffer as a result.
While pursuing such a course of action might be politically expedient, the nation’s development will be severely damaged.
Allen Houng is a professor at National Yang-Ming University’s Institute of Philosophy of Mind and Cognition.
Translated by Edward Jones
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US