Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) Chinese dream is a dream to dominate the world.
The People’s Republic of China (PRC), which overthrew the Republic of China (ROC) regime in 1949, became the lawful representative of China to the UN in 1971, replacing the exiled ROC government.
This can be seen as the crucial battle that shifted the position between the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) China and the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) China.
If Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) had been able to face up to realities at the time, there would have been a chance that the ROC in Taiwan could have left China behind and moved closer to Taiwan.
This might have meant that the party-state would have disintegrated, but it might have given way to the earlier birth of a new state, Taiwan.
The remnant of the fabricated China that exists in Taiwan faces a double-layered problem as it is dealing with the international community using the consciousness and identity of another: On the one hand, there is the fact that it is the PRC that is China, and on the other, Taiwan is not China when it comes to the issues of liberalization and democratic development.
To this day, the KMT continues to be confused trying to choose between “one China, different interpretations” and “one China, same interpretation,” failing to see that Xi’s Chinese dream is a dream of “unification” — a hegemonic mentality which aims to annex the ROC, which Beijing thinks of as “Chinese Taipei.”
It is time that Taiwan has its own Taiwanese dream.
Xi’s Chinese dream is the projection of the nationalist psyche of an Eastern despotic country that was oppressed and dominated by foreign states, but is now standing up to that past humiliation to become a powerful force that intimidates the powers that once ruled it.
Although dreams like those of Chinese Nobel laureate Liu Xiaobo (劉曉波) — dreams of freedom and democracy — have also appeared in China, those dreams are persecuted and killed off by that totalitarian, dictatorial Chinese dream, much as Liu himself was.
The Chinese dream to dominate the world is reminiscent of imperial China, which claimed that “everything under heaven is the emperor’s land.”
That China, before it was oppressed by Western powers, was strong and powerful, believed that it was the center of everything under heaven and demonstrated a similar aggressive and invasive behavior.
Although China was ruled by invading foreigners during the Yuan and Qing dynasties, the hegemonic reflex has always existed in the Chinese nation — once it becomes powerful, it forgets past humiliation and reveals its own authoritarian character.
Xi has a Chinese dream, but Taiwan also has a Taiwanese dream.
The Taiwanese dream is the dream of the Aborigines and the early migrants who arrived during the Ming and Qing dynasties, as well as those who came together with the exiles of the KMT’s China and managed to leave their colonial ideology behind and were reborn here. It is the dream of those who have, thanks to our free and democratic system, been able to build a progressive nation, which is small yet beautiful.
For the sake of this Taiwanese dream, people who live in Taiwan should cherish the democracy that they have developed here in their own nation.
They should let the world know that Taiwan is different from China, that Taiwan is not China.
Lee Min-yung is a poet.
Translated by Lin Lee-Kai
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers