As disputes raged over the presidential results from Kenya’s election on Aug. 8, a little-noticed democratic revolution blossomed in the layer of government directly underneath.
Kenyans sent home 25 out of 47 county governors, upholding a strong anti-incumbency tradition and warning that voters would turf out failing local leaders after power and money devolved to the counties in the last election cycle.
Anti-corruption campaigners — and voters — hope the new taste of direct accountability would eventually help curb corruption in east Africa’s biggest economy and weaken the grip of parties that rely on ethnic voting blocs.
“Party doesn’t matter. We want performers” said Ann Wairimu, 48, a real-estate agent in Nairobi, where dirty water and open sewers caused a recent cholera outbreak.
Voters threw out former Nairobi governor Evans Kidero for failing to deliver public services.
His replacement, Mike Sonko, is famed for his flamboyant fashion and high-profile social projects. When not sporting a sequined hat, he is often photographed leading teams shoveling piles of rubbish from the streets.
“Kidero sat in his office and did not deliver anything to the common man,” Wairimu said.
“Sonko actually goes to those poor communities and concerns himself with things like sewage systems and garbage collection,” she said.
From independence from Britain in 1963 until the 2013 elections, Kenya’s budget and social services were managed — and mismanaged — by the president and a small coterie of ministers.
An incumbent president never lost an election and three out of four presidents have come from the Kikuyu ethnic group, fueling resentment and ethnically based politics.
Years of one-party rule followed by a series of flawed elections led voters to despair that they were helpless to combat corruption.
Then a 2010 constitution devolved about 20 percent of the budget to 47 new counties, also handing them responsibility for basic healthcare, early education, local roads and other infrastructure.
Suddenly taxpayers lived next to the people who were spending — or stealing — their money. Since then, a couple of local politicians have had their houses or cars set alight by angry voters; one was photographed by a newspaper escaping pursuers by jumping over a fence, but most were punished at the polls.
As well as most governors, two-thirds of local legislators were voted out, many after spurious taxpayer-funded jaunts to Singapore and Dubai, and dodgy procurement deals.
“Many politicians don’t do their jobs properly so there’s continual frustration, but now at least people know they can have some say in how their resources are managed,” said Murithi Mutiga, the senior Kenya analyst for International Crisis Group.
Aware of growing voter frustration, at least three governors have declined government funds for a lavish inauguration.
Devolution also helped defuse anger over the disputed presidential election.
Opposition leader Raila Odinga is to challenge the results in court after the electoral board said Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta won by 1.4 million votes.
The winner-take-all element to presidential contests was a key part of the violence that followed a flawed election in 2007, killing more than 1,200 people, anti-corruption campaigner John Githongo said.
Before the new constitution, the winner controlled Kenya’s entire budget — 2.6 trillion Kenyan shillings (US$25 billion) this year.
Now that the counties get a cut, at the very least money is being stolen by a much wider range of people, Githongo said.
“Before, it was just the central government. That has changed ... more can ‘eat’ under devolution,” he said, using Kenya’s common euphemism for corruption.
It is not just about spreading wealth.
Some governors were re-elected by a landslide after they worked to provide services.
In Makueni County, Harvard-educated Governor Kivutha Kibwana won 88 percent of the vote after trying to crackdown on corruption in the county assembly; legislators had demanded he undertake a mental exam.
In the coastal county of Kwale, an Odinga stronghold, Governor Salim Mvurya was re-elected with 65 percent of the vote, despite jumping from the opposition to the ruling party.
Voters praised his investment in clinics, water projects and roads and said they voted on achievement, not party or ethnicity.
“I gave birth to my first born son in the house in 2008 because I could not walk the long distance to the main hospital in Kwale town. Now I can scream from my house and a nurse at the new dispensary can hear and run to my rescue,” said Hamza Said, a 32-year-old mother of three, who had her daughter in a new clinic last year.
Several voters said that even though their presidential candidate appeared to have lost, they were satisfied because they got the governor they wanted.
“I voted for Raila and it pains me that he lost, but for the governor, I had no doubt who I wanted. It had to be Mvurya,” said Mohammed Issa, 25, who runs a grocery store in Kwale town.
“That man has lit up this county,” he said.
Additional reporting by Joseph Akwiri and Maggie Fick
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past