Saturday marks the official beginning of the Summer Universiade. From now until the end of this month, Taiwan will be responsible for the safety of more than 7,500 athletes from 141 countries.
The ability to quickly and efficiently share potential security threats, information about unwanted individuals, and lost and found information with other nations would be invaluable.
Interpol’s database would provide just that. Unfortunately, Taiwan is one of very few nations denied access to that database.
Interpol, which is based in Lyon, France, aims to provide its 190 member nations (out of the world’s 196 countries) with effective and real-time communication between their police forces.
One particularly useful Interpol service is its I-24/7 global police communications system, which allows members to share sensitive and urgent police information year-round, day and night.
Another useful resource to have access to would be the Stolen and Lost Travel Documents database.
In a recent interview, Representative to France Zhang Ming-zhong (張銘忠) said that if Taiwan is to ensure the safety and security of the athletes participating in the Universiade, it must be able to share intelligence with other nations. Taiwan made numerous requests to access information from the I-24/7 database, but was rebuffed, Zhang said.
Each inquiry is met with the same response: Any request must be made via Beijing.
It is crazy that the nation is being excluded from such an important international organization. Not just because of what Taiwan can get from it, but also because of what it could contribute — as with global health issues and the WHO, so with law enforcement and Interpol.
Zhang was quite clear about the problem’s cause: Interpol is too concerned about what Beijing thinks.
He has a point: Since November last year, Interpol’s president has been Chinese Deputy Minister of Public Security Meng Hongwei (孟宏偉). His term ends in 2020.
Meanwhile, since Taiwan is excluded from accessing Interpol’s database, we have to rely on information provided by the US and Japan, Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) said on Saturday.
As with many of Taiwan’s troubles participating in international organizations, this exclusion is the direct result of pressure from Beijing. It is also due in no small part to the insistence of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) that Taiwan still represents the true government of China, under the name of the Republic of China (ROC).
Interpol was formed in 1923. The ROC became a member state in 1961, but withdrew for all practical purposes, in 1984, when the People’s Republic of China joined.
As part of its application for Interpol membership, China demanded that the Taiwanese delegation change its name to “Taiwan, China,” that Interpol cease referring to the delegation as “ROC,” and that ROC membership could only continue as a sub-bureau of China, thereby losing its right to vote in plenary sessions.
Then-president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) could not accept these conditions, and so Taiwan essentially withdrew from Interpol.
Attempts to participate, even as an observer nation, failed last year, despite support from the US, which last year signed into law legislation requiring the US secretary of state to develop a strategy to obtain Interpol observer status for Taiwan. Further attempts are unlikely to succeed as long as Meng is Interpol’s president.
Taiwan has been limited for decades by the illusion of the ROC, and its claims to represent China. The KMT, which formerly equated itself with the ROC, is an antiquated, spent force. If this country wants to participate in international organizations, it has to do so as Taiwan — and let the ROC go.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US