Taiwan Water Corp chairman Kuo Chun-ming (郭俊銘) has suggested that water prices could be raised during droughts. According to this suggestion, if the water supply in an area falls below a certain value, users would have to pay more for their water.
However, the only result of such an approach would probably be to increase administrative costs and cause the situation to deteriorate even further.
The nation’s water situation is prone to quick changes. A typhoon or torrential rain can change the situation altogether so that a period of measures to fight a drought could be followed by flooding. This situation makes it questionable whether it would be reasonable to ask the public to pay more for their water during a temporarily difficult situation.
Furthermore, using only the water level at reservoirs and rivers as a measure of the situation leaves something to be desired. When the Water Resources Agency announces the water situation, it also considers factors such as weather forecasts, groundwater and regional support; information that is discussed by the concerned departments before a conclusion is reached.
Using the water level as an administrative standard when making decisions on water reserves or rationing is workable, but if it was also used to decide water prices, too much importance would be given to the accuracy of the alert level system.
Such an approach could perhaps also be open to political interference. Therefore, how to accurately reflect the water situation in a certain place at a certain time would also likely become a source of dispute.
Another issue is that topological, geological and hydrological factors, as well as land use issues, must be considered before construction of water reservoirs, which means that a reservoir cannot necessarily be built somewhere just because water is needed there. This means that allocation between regions is both reasonable and necessary.
Keelung relies mainly on Feitsui Reservoir (翡翠水庫), while Kaohsiung relies mainly on the Gaoping River (高屏溪) for its water, although when there is a shortfall, water can be transported via pipeline from the Nanhua Reservoir (南化水庫). Miaoli County and Tainan have several reservoirs that can serve as backup for other areas.
There are some mayors and county commissioners who are unwilling to assist in the construction of water reservoirs due to environmental pressures and instead prefer to rely on other cities and counties for their water. However, to punish local residents for this is neither fair nor reasonable.
The jurisdictions of cities and counties do not match the distribution of piped water areas, and reservoir management is not the responsibility of cities and counties. If a failure to properly manage reservoirs is creating water problems, is requiring local users to pay more for their water not putting the cart before the horse?
It is indeed necessary to save water and to set a reasonable price for water. However, Taiwan Water should take a page from Taiwan Power Co’s book and adapt its summer season pricing for electricity.
There is no need to complicate matters, and it would be better to start out with a dry season price. The dry season runs from November to April, a full six months.
It would be better to pick the two driest months, January and February, and test to see whether a higher price would have an effect on use, resulting in water savings. Such a test should apply to the whole nation, which would result in less resistance, as it would be more fair and reasonable.
At the same time, Taiwan Water should fulfill its role as a supplier of water and increase the production of clean water, improve piping and reduce leakage.
The company must avoid a situation where nothing is done when water turbidity rises due to torrential rainfall, or where there are water shortages due to an inability to transport water, even though there is sufficient supply. Once Taiwan Water meets its responsibilities, adjustments to water prices will follow automatically.
Chang Yen-ming is a former director of the Taichung branch of the Water Resources Agency.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US