Before we learn how to use language properly for communication, it is like an umbilical cord, connecting us to the world as we develop a relationship with our surroundings. This begins with the baby and its main caretaker calling each other.
Language is not only a tool for communication and identification, it is also loaded with emotions related to our experience of the world, including trust, emotions, a sense of identity and of reality.
In a community, a shared mother language is the vessel of shared experience. A shared language not only facilitates communication, mutual understanding and reaching agreement when we work together, it also gives us a basic sense of security thanks to the community’s concern, embrace and comfort.
In modern history, many governments have tried to make the native language of a socially dominant group the national language. When that is the case, the language can help bring about cultural hegemony. Without protection of cultural diversity and language equality, the national language could serve the vested interests of the dominant group.
In multilingual and multi-ethnic countries, the need for a common national language to allow citizens to communicate with each other must not be the only consideration: Consideration must also be given to the continued existence of the languages that other groups use for emotional, identity, recognition and security reasons.
This is not a matter of which language is more widely used, but about promoting social justice.
For these reasons, there should be laws in multiethnic nations to ensure that the native language of each group — including sign language for the hearing impaired — is given the same status and official recognition as a national language.
However, a look at language politics shows that in reality, hegemonic languages gain dominance over minority languages in daily interactions; languages are not given the same opportunity in communication, broadcasting or education, and can also be systemically excluded.
This is why governments must intervene and, for example, introduce national language laws to protect minority languages to improve language equality.
In the spirit of language equality and cultural diversity, Taiwan’s national languages should include Taiwanese Mandarin, Hoklo, Hakka and the languages of all the Aboriginal peoples.
Languages on the verge of extinction due to their disadvantaged position in daily interactions and the exchange of social information must be preserved, revived and promoted through reallocation of resources, more cultural representation and legislation.
Taiwan should also promote the learning of other Asian languages and especially Southeast Asian languages, not only because it would facilitate exchanges with neighboring countries, but also because it is a source of identity and recognition among Southeast Asian immigrants and their children.
As a result of globalization, English has become an essential skill. However, Taiwanese must not forget that English has become more than just a tool for communication and it is establishing potential cultural hegemony.
In a way, this threatens Taiwanese’s sense of identity by creating a polarized framework in which you either speak English or you do not.
This creates an imaginary relationship between master and slave, as many Taiwanese do not realize that by worshiping the English language and identifying with the “English empire” they have become willing victims of a kind of colonialism by placing themselves in a marginalized position from the English center, which gives them a false emotional solace and sense of recognition.
Chou Ping is an associate professor at Nanhua University’s Department of Applied Sociology.
Translated by Tu Yu-an
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US