A problematic urban renewal project has come to light in New Taipei City’s Sanchong District (三重). The implementer — a construction company rather than an autonomous renewal organization — submitted its business plan in 2010. The application was approved in 2014 and a notice of its implementation was issued.
However, the company ran into financial problems and never applied for a construction license. The New Taipei City Government canceled the plan, leaving the land lying derelict and the residents in limbo.
This case highlights a loophole and legal risk associated with urban renewal of which most people are probably unaware — even after a plan has been approved by authorities, it can often take years for the houses to be built and the property rights to be transferred to the residents.
Comparing urban renewal projects to buying pre-sale property might make this easier to understand.
In a pre-sale property deal, the consumer buys a new house or apartment, but in an urban renewal project, the original residents usually participate based on the terms of their agreements with the implementer — or rights transfer agreement — whereby they gain a newly built house or apartment in exchange for the original value of their land or buildings.
What urban renewal and pre-sale property deals have in common is that the new properties only come into existence after several years. In both cases, the time involved makes the construction company’s financial status extremely important.
If a reputable developer with plenty of experience in urban renewal is chosen, it would to some extent reduce the financial risk. It is therefore advisable to do a background check on the company before signing the papers.
The information is not that hard to get.
The first thing is to find out whether the building firm has an official Web site and tangible achievements.
Next, visit the Judicial Yuan’s Web site to check whether the company has been involved in any litigation over urban renewal disputes.
The Web site of the Ministry of Economic Affairs’ Department of Commerce has a “company and branch company registration information inquiry” page where a company’s paid-in capital and date of incorporation can be searched. From this information, a basic idea of the company’s financial situation can be gleaned so residents can judge whether it is a “one-case firm,” as it is commonly known.
In an urban renewal project, residents can take a step further by agreeing with the developer to implement the project by means of a trust, because setting up a trust is good for both parties.
Under a trust, a bank controls the funds and makes sure they are used for their designated purpose, thus ensuring a project’s smooth completion.
For the developer, property under a trust is not subject to compulsory execution, and in principle, trust relations do not become void in the event of death, bankruptcy or incapacity, so both parties can maintain stable, long-term legal relations.
Once work on the project has been completed as planned, the trustee bank transfers the rights for the land and finished buildings to the residents according to the ratios stipulated in the cooperative construction contract and house-selection agreement or according to the distribution inventory of the rights transfer plan, thereby avoiding disputes when the transfer is registered.
If this is combined with a construction continuation and completion mechanism, it can further ensure that the project does not grind to a halt if the developer runs into financial trouble.
Of course, whether such a mechanism is effective depends on the arrangements of the mechanism and the actual conditions of the project, such as the prevailing market conditions, the property rights situation and the originally agreed terms.
These factors decide whether other implementers will be willing to take over the project, but such a mechanism can at least give residents an extra layer of protection.
Article 56, Paragraph 2 of the Urban Renewal Act (都市更新條例), which gives authorities the power to revoke their approval of renewal projects, further stipulates that the authorities “can take [a renewal project] over compulsorily [and] the regulations for taking it over are instituted by the central authority.”
In 1999, the Ministry of the Interior implemented the Regulations of Right Transfer of Urban Renewal (都市更新事業接管辦法), Article 2 of which stipulates: “When the municipal, county or city authority takes over [an urban renewal project] in accordance with Article 56, Paragraph 2 of the [Urban Renewal] Act, it may allocate a budget or use urban renewal funds to implement it in accordance with these regulations.”
If these rules can be applied — or the conditions and method of transfer revised to make the compulsory transfer system truly effective — it would build public confidence in urban renewal and make the government’s policy of encouraging urban renewal easier to implement.
Kevin Liu is a partner at Lee and Li Attorneys-at-Law.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US