Dozens of elephants from Laos are being illegally bought by China to be displayed in zoos and safari parks across the nation, wildlife investigator and filmmaker Karl Ammann said.
Ammann said the so-called captive elephants in Laos sell for about £23,000 (US$30,229) before being walked across the border into China by handlers or “mahouts” near the border town of Boten. They are transported to receiving facilities, which buy them from the agents for up to £230,000 per animal.
“That is a nice mark-up and makes it exactly the kind of commercial transaction which under CITES rules is not acceptable,” he said, referring to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora.
Ammann and his crew stumbled on the illicit trade between Laos and China earlier this year, while investigating the sale of 16 Asian elephants from Laos to a safari park in Dubai. None of the elephants had the necessary permits for export. The translocation was stopped by a direct order from the new Laotian prime minister at the last moment, while an Emirates Airlines Cargo 747 was already on the tarmac in Vientiane, the nation’s capital.
“We then looked into the background of these elephants and met with several of the owners of the elephants, as well as the local agent who arranged this sale,” Ammann said.
Delving deeper, he and his investigative team discovered that the trade in live elephants from Laos mainly involved China, with almost 100 animals ending up in Chinese zoos and facilities.
Many mahouts told Ammann on camera that their elephants are captive-bred, but have been sired by a wild bull elephant. To avoid stud costs, mahouts in Laos tie captive-bred females to trees in the forest so that they can be mated with wild bulls.
Under CITES Appendix I, an elephant with a wild parent in an uncontrolled setting is not considered captive-bred and therefore may not be sold commercially.
Almost 100 Asian elephants are believed to have been sold from Laos to China over the past couple of years.
Hu Chunmei, an animal welfare advocate in China, said she has already established that six zoos — all government-owned — have a confirmed 38 elephants from Laos, with 50 more likely to be Laotian.
However, the trade in live Asian elephants contravenes international regulations. Like African elephants, Asian elephants are considered a species threatened with extinction. All international trade is prohibited by CITES unless it is not for commercial purposes, or unless the elephants originate from a CITES-approved facility of captive-bred animals.
However, Laos does not have a single CITES-approved breeding facility and Ammann says the transactions have been commercial. Some zoos have paid Chinese intermediaries up to 10 times as much as the latter paid owners in Laos.
Elephants are a popular and renumerative attraction at Chinese circuses, zoos and safari parks — they are still expected to perform in some places, although this is increasingly controversial. Conditions can be poor — some reviewers on Tripadvisor describe elephants confined in small concrete boxes. The elephants are sourced from a number of places.
In 2015, and again last year, amid a global outcry, Chinese zoos and safari parks flew in more than 60 baby African elephants taken from their families in the wild in Zimbabwe. The elephants are now at the Shanghai Wild Animal Park, the Beijing Wildlife Park and the Hangzhou Safari Park, among other venues.
This would not be the first time Laos had breached CITES requirements.
In July last year, the CITES secretariat highlighted “gaps in implementation under Article XIII of the convention” and recommended that Laos improve its compliance ability, and law enforcement of illegal wild animal and plant trafficking.
One of the measures available to CITES is to recommend that wildlife trade is suspended with Laos, CITES secretary-general John Scanlon said.
However, that measure is used only “as a last resort, as our primary goal is to work with and assist CITES parties in the effective implementation of the convention,” he said.
A CITES technical committee is in Laos at the moment to verify the nation’s progress.
“Our comment on the alleged export of Asian elephants from Laos will entirely depend on the nature of the trade and details of the particular transaction,” Scanlon added.
Ammann is skeptical that action will be taken.
“The CITES secretariat should have recommended the suspension of Laos for non-compliance and lack of enforcement a long time ago, but they are a UN body and rocking the boat is not in their nature, even though suspension is a vital enforcement tool at their disposition and readmission is an option once compliance has been achieved,” he said.
While Laos still has considerable distance to go in stopping the trade, Ammann believes that China also needs to be held accountable.
“China has been on the front lines of importing iconic live species from rhino to killer whales, elephants and recently 150 chimps — all totally illegal — and Article VIII of the convention dictates that parties involved in the illegal import be prosecuted, the animals in question confiscated and, if possible, repatriated — but this does not seem to apply to China,” he said.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US