Dozens of elephants from Laos are being illegally bought by China to be displayed in zoos and safari parks across the nation, wildlife investigator and filmmaker Karl Ammann said.
Ammann said the so-called captive elephants in Laos sell for about £23,000 (US$30,229) before being walked across the border into China by handlers or “mahouts” near the border town of Boten. They are transported to receiving facilities, which buy them from the agents for up to £230,000 per animal.
“That is a nice mark-up and makes it exactly the kind of commercial transaction which under CITES rules is not acceptable,” he said, referring to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora.
Ammann and his crew stumbled on the illicit trade between Laos and China earlier this year, while investigating the sale of 16 Asian elephants from Laos to a safari park in Dubai. None of the elephants had the necessary permits for export. The translocation was stopped by a direct order from the new Laotian prime minister at the last moment, while an Emirates Airlines Cargo 747 was already on the tarmac in Vientiane, the nation’s capital.
“We then looked into the background of these elephants and met with several of the owners of the elephants, as well as the local agent who arranged this sale,” Ammann said.
Delving deeper, he and his investigative team discovered that the trade in live elephants from Laos mainly involved China, with almost 100 animals ending up in Chinese zoos and facilities.
Many mahouts told Ammann on camera that their elephants are captive-bred, but have been sired by a wild bull elephant. To avoid stud costs, mahouts in Laos tie captive-bred females to trees in the forest so that they can be mated with wild bulls.
Under CITES Appendix I, an elephant with a wild parent in an uncontrolled setting is not considered captive-bred and therefore may not be sold commercially.
Almost 100 Asian elephants are believed to have been sold from Laos to China over the past couple of years.
Hu Chunmei, an animal welfare advocate in China, said she has already established that six zoos — all government-owned — have a confirmed 38 elephants from Laos, with 50 more likely to be Laotian.
However, the trade in live Asian elephants contravenes international regulations. Like African elephants, Asian elephants are considered a species threatened with extinction. All international trade is prohibited by CITES unless it is not for commercial purposes, or unless the elephants originate from a CITES-approved facility of captive-bred animals.
However, Laos does not have a single CITES-approved breeding facility and Ammann says the transactions have been commercial. Some zoos have paid Chinese intermediaries up to 10 times as much as the latter paid owners in Laos.
Elephants are a popular and renumerative attraction at Chinese circuses, zoos and safari parks — they are still expected to perform in some places, although this is increasingly controversial. Conditions can be poor — some reviewers on Tripadvisor describe elephants confined in small concrete boxes. The elephants are sourced from a number of places.
In 2015, and again last year, amid a global outcry, Chinese zoos and safari parks flew in more than 60 baby African elephants taken from their families in the wild in Zimbabwe. The elephants are now at the Shanghai Wild Animal Park, the Beijing Wildlife Park and the Hangzhou Safari Park, among other venues.
This would not be the first time Laos had breached CITES requirements.
In July last year, the CITES secretariat highlighted “gaps in implementation under Article XIII of the convention” and recommended that Laos improve its compliance ability, and law enforcement of illegal wild animal and plant trafficking.
One of the measures available to CITES is to recommend that wildlife trade is suspended with Laos, CITES secretary-general John Scanlon said.
However, that measure is used only “as a last resort, as our primary goal is to work with and assist CITES parties in the effective implementation of the convention,” he said.
A CITES technical committee is in Laos at the moment to verify the nation’s progress.
“Our comment on the alleged export of Asian elephants from Laos will entirely depend on the nature of the trade and details of the particular transaction,” Scanlon added.
Ammann is skeptical that action will be taken.
“The CITES secretariat should have recommended the suspension of Laos for non-compliance and lack of enforcement a long time ago, but they are a UN body and rocking the boat is not in their nature, even though suspension is a vital enforcement tool at their disposition and readmission is an option once compliance has been achieved,” he said.
While Laos still has considerable distance to go in stopping the trade, Ammann believes that China also needs to be held accountable.
“China has been on the front lines of importing iconic live species from rhino to killer whales, elephants and recently 150 chimps — all totally illegal — and Article VIII of the convention dictates that parties involved in the illegal import be prosecuted, the animals in question confiscated and, if possible, repatriated — but this does not seem to apply to China,” he said.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers