The nation’s lawmakers never cease to amaze the public with their physical antics in the legislature.
From the usual shoving, pulling, hair-pulling and shouting matches that the public has grown accustomed to, or the childish battles of the past that involved tossing lunchboxes, cups of water or shredding, last week lawmakers upgraded their props, their acting ability and their physicality to take their playground theatrics to an absurd new level.
The scenes on Thursday and Friday left many people shaking their heads; with all the physical feats displayed, netizens — with a few creative cuts and professional-level touch-ups of news footage — could easily create a short clip of lawmakers appearing to promote the Taipei Universiade through feats of physical derring-do.
In the throwing contest, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers hurled water balloons and fake banknotes at their “opponents”; in weightlifting, chairs were tossed about; while in the judo event, KMT Legislator Alex Fai (費鴻泰) grappled with Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Chun-yi (李俊俋), wrestling one-on-one and twisting each other’s elbows.
There was even a cheerleading squad, which blew air horns and whistles, and brandished placards.
Amid the chaos, KMT Legislator Hsu Shu-hua (許淑華), formerly head of the Nantou Taekwondo Committee, allegedly slapped DPP Legislator Chiu Yi-ying (邱議瑩). Pan-blue camp supporters later dubbed Hsu “Wonder Woman,” while KMT Acting Chairman Lin Cheng-tse (林政則) said the 34 KMT lawmakers were “Robin Hoods” fighting for justice for the public.
The public has always been eager to see the nation gain more international recognition, only to be repeatedly embarrassed by the notoriety the Legislative Yuan has earned in the world’s media. The negative light brought by repeated video clips of the brawls and fisticuffs being aired on CNN and other networks around the world has again tarnished Taiwan’s reputation.
The Legislative Yuan is where legislators are supposed to deliberate on bills, scrutinize budgets and monitor the work of the administrative branch.
The very reason for the legislature’s special provisional sessions this month and last is so the representatives of the public can review the Forward-looking Infrastructure Development Program, which the DPP government claims could increase GDP by 0.1 percent, with NT$470.5 billion (US$15.47 billion) in real GDP contributions and NT$506.5 billion in nominal GDP contributions over the program’s first four years.
Lawmakers certainly have much to do to live up to the public’s expectations. How are the program’s budgets being proposed? Is the suggested sum for each proposal reasonable?
KMT lawmakers could very well make use of their legislative power to question the premier and to highlight what they consider controversial appropriations. This would allow them to demonstrate to voters how well they are doing their job, and show that despite being in the minority in the legislature, they can behave as a responsible opposition party, one that is capable of providing constructive criticism as it represents the concerns of its constituents.
Regrettably, KMT lawmakers have resorted to childish obstruction and circus-like brawls to disrupt the legislative process and show their unhappiness with the DPP, while failing in their duty to allow the premier to deliver his report on the proposed infrastructure program and then question him about it.
The failure of the KMT lawmakers to engage in rational deliberation has left the public once again disappointed with the party as a whole, and reminded everyone that the KMT, which had to be dragged kicking and screaming into the democratic era, has never really understood how to operate in a democracy, both within the party and without.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past