Thirty years ago was a chilling era for Taiwan, full of darkness, fear and terror. It was also a memorable era, full of ideals, enthusiasm and hope. In those years, there were many selfless and brave people who were not afraid of suppression and hardship, who did not know if they would see tomorrow, and yet they continued to strive for a better tomorrow for Taiwanese.
In those years, out of the simple desire for freedom and democracy, we participated in all kinds of social movements, looking forward to a better society.
From the age of 19, due to the circumstances in which I found myself, I devoted myself to the dangwai (黨外, “outside the party”) movement, a political movement in Taiwan in the mid-1970s and early 1980s to oppose the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), fighting with many comrades against the oppression of the state apparatus, and was imprisoned for my part in all this.
Then Taiwan lifted the party ban and martial law, and the first direct legislative election was held in 1992, followed by the first direct presidential election in 1996, and then by transfers of political power, turning Taiwan step-by-step into a democratic nation that is mature and that values human rights.
The ideals of my juvenile years have come true one by one, something that makes me feel my life has been worth it after all.
However, when I look back, the scenes of blood and tears in the nation’s painful history are still unforgettable — all the struggle, the sacrifice of many people fighting for democracy — they fought for democratic reform, freedom and human rights, which led to endless years of imprisonment and, in some cases, cost their lives.
How honored and privileged I am to have been able to join them to take part in the nation’s democratization process. None of this could have been achieved without the support of the public — from the Martial Law era to the lifting of martial law, from an absence of any political party except the KMT to instigating the dangwai movement to the establishment of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), going from dictatorship to democracy — all these achievements are what I am deeply grateful for, and I will never forget.
I am also delighted to see evidence of political awareness in subsequent generations, from the Wild Lily Student Movement (野百合學運) of February 1990 to the Sunflower movement of March 2014.
The people who were young at the time of the Wild Lily Student Movement now form the backbone of society, while the students of the Sunflower movement have accepted the torch of freedom and democracy that has been passed on to them and held it up at this crucial juncture for society and the government to see.
I can see the future of Taiwan in the new generation. The seeds planted during several decades of pro-democracy movements are finally starting to germinate and grow shoots. These people, born after the lifting of martial law, are clear-headed and sure of purpose. That young people are stepping up, that democracy is being passed down to the next generation, is a source of much reassurance for me.
As we celebrate the 30th anniversary of the lifting of martial law, Taiwan has already experienced three transitions of political power and introduced democracy and the rule of law. The process has not been a smooth one and we must still strive forward.
We have gone from a street movement to a fully fledged political party, and we are honored to have received the public’s trust in moving forward and facing each new challenge that comes our way.
In the past, the struggle was between the ideal of democracy and the autocratic state: it was black and white; right versus wrong. There was no need for us to doubt what we were doing, we were very clear about which side we should be standing on. It was about the masses protesting against unjust state power.
Now that the dictator’s statues have been toppled, the nation must operate within the bounds of a democratic system. The government belongs to the public and some form of balance must be sought in the rights and interests of ordinary people. Each social movement represents the interests of groups and each has its own goals.
As every new civic movement emerges among a multitude of social and economic discourses — the public interest and individual rights, freedom or equality, prosperity and progress, all of which are positive values in and of themselves — often compete with each other in the reality of everyday life.
Those in government have two main duties: to protect Taiwan’s national security and promote social progress. The former is obvious and absolute, and I observe what positive moves President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) is making in this regard.
The latter involves addressing conflicting values and the contradiction between what one would ideally want and what reality imposes.
Nevertheless, I do believe that if we are clear about what our values are and place importance on the actual results of policy, what follows is but a question of making choices and standing by them.
Revolution is sudden; reform is gradual. We have already gone through the revolutionary stage and, now that the dictator has been overthrown, the most important and difficult task is how to realize our ideals and make them succeed.
I do believe that as long as we continue to listen to what the public is saying, and adjust the way we proceed accordingly and continue to take Taiwan in the direction of becoming a civilized nation, ever mindful of why we started off on this path in the first place, then we are sure to succeed.
It is with this thought in mind that we commemorate the 30th anniversary of the lifting of martial law.
Chen Chu is Kaohsiung mayor and a former prisoner for her part in the Kaohsiung Incident.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai and Paul Cooper
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
The Hong Kong government on Monday gazetted sweeping amendments to the implementation rules of Article 43 of its National Security Law. There was no legislative debate, no public consultation and no transition period. By the time the ink dried on the gazette, the new powers were already in force. This move effectively bypassed Hong Kong’s Legislative Council. The rules were enacted by the Hong Kong chief executive, in conjunction with the Committee for Safeguarding National Security — a body shielded from judicial review and accountable only to Beijing. What is presented as “procedural refinement” is, in substance, a shift away from
The shifting geopolitical tectonic plates of this year have placed Beijing in a profound strategic dilemma. As Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) prepares for a high-stakes summit with US President Donald Trump, the traditional power dynamics of the China-Japan-US triangle have been destabilized by the diplomatic success of Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi in Washington. For the Chinese leadership, the anxiety is two-fold: There is a visceral fear of being encircled by a hardened security alliance, and a secondary risk of being left in a vulnerable position by a transactional deal between Washington and Tokyo that might inadvertently empower Japan
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
RSS