The Legislative Yuan on July 5 added three projects to the Forward-looking Infrastructure Development Program to improve food safety, boost the birth rate and cultivate talent.
For the food safety project, the Food and Drug Administration has planned a budget of more than NT$5 billion (US$164.4 million) — later reduced to about NT$3 billion by the Executive Yuan — to build laboratories and testing facilities, and to purchase inspection vehicles.
However, such an approach is questionable, because food safety needs to be monitored from the source, rather than tested after the production process.
If the nation wants to create an effective system to ensure food safety, it must address every aspect of food production from the farm to the moment it is served.
This would require increased regulations, information and education on food safety, as well as more inspection staff, technologies and facilities among others.
Every aspect is interconnected and requires full cooperation between local governments, the Council of Agriculture, the Ministry of Health and Welfare, the Environmental Protection Administration and the courts.
However, the project focuses solely on enhancing food inspection hardware, which is not very forward-looking.
Regarding the source of agricultural products, conventional farming — which uses chemical fertilizers and herbicides — is the most common practice in the nation. Although organic, toxin-free agricultural products are healthier, they are rare and too expensive for most people.
The government should prioritize the promotion of affordable and healthier agricultural products by helping develop farming technologies and plant genetics.
If organic and toxin-free agricultural products could become part of the nation’s mainstream diet, it would help reduce the cost of medical treatment and care services, and allow older people to live healthier, more dignified lives.
As for the sale of food products, despite the government’s efforts to promote four food certification labels and a traceability system using QR codes, the pesticide levels in many such products have been found to exceed legal limits, and there have been some cases of counterfeited certification labels.
As a result, consumers have little faith in the food inspection system.
The government should utilize technologies such as big data, blockchain and open-access information, as well as develop efficient testing technologies to build a system that covers all the important aspects of food safety.
With increased trade liberalization, the government needs to be prepared for more imported food, which is more difficult to trace and will increase the types of food available in the market.
Specifically, the government will need to enhance inspections for foreign goods before they are imported, constantly update its food database and require importers to be responsible for ensuring food safety and obtaining certification.
This should be one of the priorities of the government’s food safety project.
Policies should be designed to promote public interest first and foremost. Economic or social policies that are designed to promote certain ideologies or help a party win the next election never really work.
The development program was initially met with considerable criticism from the public, which led to several minor adjustments in the final plan.
Hopefully, President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) administration will do it right this time, as few things are more important for the public than food safety.
Lee Wu-chung is an academic specializing in agricultural economics.
Translated by Tu Yu-an
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
Gogoro Inc was once a rising star and a would-be unicorn in the years prior to its debut on the NASDAQ in 2022, as its environmentally friendly technology and stylish design attracted local young people. The electric scooter and battery swapping services provider is bracing for a major personnel shakeup following the abrupt resignation on Friday of founding chairman Horace Luke (陸學森) as chief executive officer. Luke’s departure indicates that Gogoro is sinking into the trough of unicorn disillusionment, with the company grappling with poor financial performance amid a slowdown in demand at home and setbacks in overseas expansions. About 95