The National Academy for Educational Research has announced its draft curriculum guidelines for social studies courses as part of the 12-year national education program (K12).
According to the new guidelines, the credits for senior-high school history courses will be reduced, with the material for Chinese history significantly reduced from one-and-a-half books to only one.
The past few years have seen considerable revisions to the history curriculum, specifically regarding Taiwanese and Chinese history. As a result, there has been plenty of discussion on the issue.
However, instead of simply focusing on Taiwanese and Chinese history covered in the curriculum, the government should also consider increasing the percentage of world history in it — as that would help students learn to understand and study Taiwanese history in relation to world history.
The new history guidelines also emphasize presenting historical facts in a neutral manner and asking questions without giving an answer. Such an approach was designed to help students learn about historical figures, events and developments in a more objective manner and develop the ability to decide whether a historical statement is true an early age.
It is hoped that students would be able to learn true history without being affected by ideological biases — after all that is the ideal and mission of history studies.
While Taiwanese history has traditionally been taught mainly in relation to Chinese history, increased percentage of world history in senior-high school textbooks will inspire and enable new perspectives on the nation’s history and development.
In addition, more knowledge on world history will allow students to learn about modern Taiwanese history in the context of world history as well as the relationship between them.
Overall, increasing the percentage of world history in the senior-high school curriculum will help students explore new perspectives on Taiwanese history. By teaching them to connect Taiwanese with world history, classes will not only be more interesting, but also more comprehensive.
If the main reason for reducing the credits for senior-high school history courses was to cut the percentage of Chinese history in textbooks, it would be a good idea to also expand the percentage and depth of world history in the curriculum.
That way, students can learn more about world history and culture as well as develop an international outlook and better understand globalization.
Fang Tze-yu is an adjunct assistant professor at a university.
Translated by Tu Yu-an
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers