Reporters Without Borders in April announced that it would open its first Asian office in Taiwan. Now, US-based non-governmental organization (NGO) Freedom House is reportedly also considering setting up a branch in the nation.
According to the Taichung City Government’s Social Affairs Bureau, the group contacted the bureau earlier this year to express an interest in setting up an office in the city.
The organization wishes to keep a low profile, fearing that Beijing might try to pressure it to change its mind, the bureau said.
That international groups advocating press freedom, democracy and human rights have shown an interest in establishing their Asian offices in Taiwan is a milestone for the nation’s democratic consolidation.
Taiwan is certainly fit to serve as a portal for rights watchdogs campaigning for the universal values of human rights and democracy; not merely because of its ideal geostrategic location, but also as its peaceful transformation from an authoritarian regime to a democracy is — in the words of former US secretary of state Colin Powell — a “success story” — and, in the words of former US president Barack Obama, “an example of a flourishing Asian democracy.”
In Freedom House’s latest Freedom in the World report, published in February, Taiwan scored 91 out of 100, and was given a perfect score — one out of seven, with one representing the most free and seven the least free — in political rights and civil liberties, as well as overall freedom.
Taiwan also boasts the most liberal press in Asia, according to the World Press Freedom Index released by Reporters Without Borders in April.
Although the report describes Taiwan’s situation as: “Media freedom on hold,” it notes that “the main threat to media freedom comes from China, which has been exerting growing economic and political pressure on the Taiwanese media.”
Taiwan further deepened its embrace of democracy with a historic constitutional interpretation in May that made Taiwan the first Asian nation to allow same-sex marriage.
Leveraging Taiwan’s soft power relies on its greatest asset — democracy.
At a time when China is stepping up its suppression of Taiwan’s international breathing room, either by brazen obstruction or by offering financial enticements to Taiwan’s diplomatic allies, and with Taiwan facing injustice around the world, the nation must let its soft power shine.
This is the way to distinguish itself from its communist neighbor across the Taiwan Strait that oppresses its people and deprives them of freedom of expression and other human rights.
President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) “Light Up Taiwan” slogan was an important part of her successful election campaign, and on numerous occasions since taking office she has pledged to continue fighting for Taiwan’s democracy and freedom.
Tsai’s administration should spend less time talking and more on taking concrete action. It ought to take a proactive approach and draw up substantial strategies that truly “light up Taiwan.” Taipei must seize the opportunity and promote Taiwan’s embrace of human rights and democratic credentials in a bid to attract international non-governmental organizations to set up offices in Taiwan.
If such a campaign is successful, not only would it increase Taiwan’s global visibility and highlight the essential differences between Taiwan and China, it would also help cement Taiwan’s reputation as a global citizen eager and willing to fulfill its responsibilities and contribute to the international community.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers