US and South Korean officials have said for the past year that North Korea would be able, within a short time, to miniaturize a nuclear device, mount it on an intercontinental ballistic missile and hit the continental US.
North Korea’s test launch on Tuesday last week did not conclusively demonstrate that Pyongyang has reached this point, but Alaska and Hawaii might already be within range — and US forces in South Korea and Japan certainly are.
This is not the first time the North has marked US Independence Day with fireworks. In 2006 a North Korean short-range missile barrage broke a seven-year moratorium, stemming from a 1998 Taepodong missile launch that landed in the Pacific Ocean. Tokyo responded angrily, leading Pyongyang to declare a moratorium — although it continued static-rocket testing — gaining a propaganda victory.
The North substantially increased ballistic-missile cooperation with Iran, begun earlier in the decade — a logical choice as both countries were relying on the same Soviet-era Scud missile technology and because their missile objectives were the same: Acquiring delivery capabilities for nuclear warheads.
This longstanding cooperation is one reason North Korea threatens not only the US and East Asia, but the entire world.
Strategically, this threat is already here. Unfortunately, it should have been realized decades ago to prevent it from maturing.
It is clear that nearly 25 years of diplomatic efforts, even when accompanied by economic sanctions, have failed.
US President Donald Trump has continued the “carrot and stick” approach, first with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), and more recently with South Korean President Moon Jae-in on his Washington visit.
The US must shift to a more productive approach, Trump has said.
China has been playing the US while doing next to nothing to reverse the North’s nuclear and ballistic-missile programs.
There is every reason to believe Beijing has turned a blind eye to willful violations of international sanctions and its own commitments, allowing Chinese enterprises and business people to enable Pyongyang.
Many contend the US should impose economic sanctions against China, pressuring it to pressure North Korea.
While superficially attractive, this policy would inevitably fail.
However, because the failure would take time to become evident, sanctioning China would only buy more time for Pyongyang to advance its programs.
China’s economy is so large that targeted sanctions against named individuals and institutions can have only minimal consequences. They would also suffer the common fate of such sanctions, being very easily evaded by establishing “cut-outs” carrying on the same activities under new names.
China’s decades of mixed signals about Pyongyang reflect its uncertainty about what to do with the North.
Sanctioning China might only bolster Beijing’s pro-Pyongyang faction, obviously the opposite of the result sought by the US.
Instead, Washington should focus on the real problem: North Korea. China must be made to understand that, unless the threat is eliminated by unifying the Peninsula, the US will do whatever is necessary to protect US civilians from nuclear blackmail.
This implies the use of military force, despite the risks of broader conflict on the Korean Peninsula, enormous dangers to civilians there and the threat of massive refugee flows from the North into China and South Korea. They can work with the US or face the inevitable consequences, which would be far more damaging to China.
John Bolton is a former US ambassador to the UN. This article was first published in print in the New York Post.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past