On Friday last week, the legislature passed the Act Governing Civil Servants’ Retirement, Discharge and Pensions (公務人員退休資遣撫卹法) to abolish the 18 percent preferential savings rate for civil servants in two years, and significantly lower their income replacement ratio and extend their retirement age. This is expected to save the national treasury NT$1.4 trillion (US$45.75 billion), and President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) administration deserves praise for its most daring reform so far.
After the act takes effect on July 1 next year, civil servants will no longer have their name dragged through the mud, as everyone will be equal. They will become ordinary people and will no longer belong to a special class of their own.
If the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) wants to carry out a political mobilization against the act in an election campaign, it should give up the idea now.
The Democratic Progressive Party has already resolved the KMT’s long-accumulated historical glitches and former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) failure to handle the issue during his presidency.
If the KMT plays the trick of electoral mobilization, assuming that civil servants remain their die-hard supporters, it is doomed to face another defeat.
However, for Tsai, Taiwan’s pension reform is only half finished.
After handling pensions for government employees and public-school teachers first, she should handle pensions for military personnel with caution. Moreover, the key to her administration’s success will lie in how she deals with the pension issue for tens of millions of workers.
As Tsai has said: “I have the softest spot in my heart for workers,” but the protection of workers’ well-being takes more than her left-wing thinking, writing superficial commentaries in a “hipster” style, or viewing the problem from the perspective of a “big rice pot” communal dining system under socialism.
By doing so, not only will she not make the problem better, she will make it worse.
A good example is the five-day workweek policy of “one fixed day and one flexible day off,” which has drawn complaints from all sectors.
The issue involves two laws: the Labor Insurance Act (勞工保險條例) and the Labor Standards Act (勞動基準法). For the former, the Cabinet has submitted a draft amendment to the legislature for review.
Since the draft act would significantly increase the contribution rate of employees, it has irritated both employees and employers.
The income of private-sector workers is not too high, and their average pension is a little more than NT$10,000 per month. Unlike for civil servants, there will be no ceiling of NT$63,690 or a minimum of NT$32,160 for private-sector workers. For civil servants, the money saved from the pension cut will pour into their retirement funds. However, for private-sector workers, how can their retirement funds be protected and where will the money come from?
The Tsai administration has spun a cocoon around itself: it is caught in its own trap. It is clear that the five-day workweek policy has severely damaged businesses while hurting the relatively weak workers at the grassroots level.
However, the government continues to insist on relying on figures to support the controversial policy without taking action to amend the Labor Standards Act.
As her administration refuses to amend the law that is harming both entrepreneurs and workers in a timely manner, Tsai’s claim that she has the softest spot in her heart for workers sounds more than a little disingenuous.
Chen Shan-jung is a reporter for the Liberty Times.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past