As the US-led coalition tightens the noose around the Islamic State (IS) group in Syria, Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s Iranian-backed troops are also seizing back territory from the militants with little protest from Washington, a sign of how US options are limited without a powerful ally on the ground.
Washington is loath to cooperate with al-Assad’s internationally ostracized government. However, it would be difficult to uproot IS militants and keep them out with only the Kurdish and Arab militias backed by the US — and a coalition spokesman said that al-Assad’s gains ease the burden on those forces.
However, letting al-Assad grab IS territory risks being seen as the US legitimizing his continued rule and would likely bolster his hand in his war against the already struggling rebellion.
It also threatens to further empower al-Assad’s allies, Iran and the Lebanese Hezbollah, which both have forces alongside his troops in the assault into IS-held territory.
Within the administration of US President Donald Trump, there is a split over whether to aggressively try to stem al-Assad’s advances, said a senior US official, who was not authorized to speak to reporters and requested anonymity.
US Army Colonel Ryan Dillon, spokesman for the anti-IS coalition, said Syrian government forces are welcome to reclaim IS-held territory and fill the vacuum once the extremist group is gone.
CONFLICT
The statement was startling — even more so because soon after, Trump this week warned al-Assad he would pay “a heavy price,” claiming “potential” evidence that Syria was preparing for another chemical weapons attack.
The mixed messages reveal a discomfiting fact that most policymakers would rather not spell out: Al-Assad is a pariah, but he is also a convenient tool to secure and govern territory in majority-Arab cities in a complex terrain.
The situation in Syria is a contrast to Iraq, where the coalition and the Iraqi government, working hand-in-glove, appear to be on the verge of retaking the main IS group redoubt in the city of Mosul.
The Syrian government has repeatedly suggested that everyone is welcome to work with it to defeat the IS.
Syrian Legislator Mohammad Kheir Akkam questioned US support for the Kurdish-led forces, “despite the fact that the Syrian-Russian cooperation has achieved more results in combating terrorism,” while US efforts have “had the opposite result.”
The US so far has shunned any cooperation with the Syrian leader, whom Trump described as an “animal.”
Instead, it has partnered with local Kurdish and Arab forces known as the Syrian Democratic Forces, (SDF).
Those fighters are spearheading the assault on the IS group’s self-declared capital, Raqqa, in northern Syria and then face the prospect of assaulting the group’s final major stronghold to the southeast, in Deir el-Zour.
However, US support for the Kurdish-led group has angered Turkey, which views it as an extension of a Kurdish insurgency within its own territory.
The SDF is also viewed with suspicion by the predominantly Arab residents of Raqqa and Deir el-Zour.
Furthermore, the SDF, numbering about 50,000 fighters, is already risking overstretch and is in no way ready for the more challenging battle in Deir el-Zour.
Al-Assad and his Iranian allies, on the other hand, have steadily positioned themselves in key areas on the flanks of the US-led war against the IS group, grabbing territory on several fronts, including on the outskirts of Raqqa and Deir el-Zour.
With Russian and Iranian support, al-Assad has made steady gains and now controls almost all of Syria’s major cities except those held by the IS.
POWER PLAY
The symbolism was striking this week as a smiling al-Assad paid a visit to central Hama, driving his own car, and to a Russian air base in western Syria, where he posed alongside Russian generals and inside the cockpit of a Russian Su-35 fighter jet.
Syrian troops have positioned themselves on Raqqa’s southwestern flanks, and officials have vowed to retake the city eventually.
The US has insisted that the city should be handed over to a local council that would handle its administration post-liberation — and it has made clear it will not tolerate the Syrian government and its allies cashing in on the fight.
US forces recently shot down a Syrian aircraft, as well as drones believed connected to Iranian-supported forces, as tensions escalated near a base where the coalition trains Syrian rebels.
However, the senior US official said there was significant disagreement about how aggressively the US should try to prevent al-Assad from reclaiming the territory the IS group vacates, with some in the White House pushing a more forceful approach while the US Department of State and the Pentagon warn of the risks.
Keeping al-Assad’s territory to a minimum would ensure his hand is not strengthened in an eventual political deal to end the conflict, making it more likely the US could deliver on its long-standing desire to see him leave power.
Limiting his control in eastern Syria would also prevent Iranian-backed forces from securing a wide corridor through Iraq to Syria and all the way into Lebanon.
The more risk-averse voices in Trump’s administration are wary about letting the US slip into a more direct fight with al-Assad, the official said.
Dillon told reporters at the Pentagon that the US goal is to defeat the IS group wherever it exists.
NEUTRAL
If others, including the Syrian government and its Iranian and Russian allies, want to fight the extremists, “we absolutely have no problem with that,” he said.
The Atlantic Council’s Rafik Hariri Center for the Middle East director Frederic Hof said the comments reflect the narrow US view of the Syrian war, focused very specifically on the neutralization of the IS.
In the coalition view, “it is all about killing ISIS in Raqqa,” Hof wrote in an article this week, using another acronym for the extremist group.
“Creating conditions that would keep it dead? That, presumably, would be someone else’s job,” he said.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers