As the US-led coalition tightens the noose around the Islamic State (IS) group in Syria, Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s Iranian-backed troops are also seizing back territory from the militants with little protest from Washington, a sign of how US options are limited without a powerful ally on the ground.
Washington is loath to cooperate with al-Assad’s internationally ostracized government. However, it would be difficult to uproot IS militants and keep them out with only the Kurdish and Arab militias backed by the US — and a coalition spokesman said that al-Assad’s gains ease the burden on those forces.
However, letting al-Assad grab IS territory risks being seen as the US legitimizing his continued rule and would likely bolster his hand in his war against the already struggling rebellion.
It also threatens to further empower al-Assad’s allies, Iran and the Lebanese Hezbollah, which both have forces alongside his troops in the assault into IS-held territory.
Within the administration of US President Donald Trump, there is a split over whether to aggressively try to stem al-Assad’s advances, said a senior US official, who was not authorized to speak to reporters and requested anonymity.
US Army Colonel Ryan Dillon, spokesman for the anti-IS coalition, said Syrian government forces are welcome to reclaim IS-held territory and fill the vacuum once the extremist group is gone.
CONFLICT
The statement was startling — even more so because soon after, Trump this week warned al-Assad he would pay “a heavy price,” claiming “potential” evidence that Syria was preparing for another chemical weapons attack.
The mixed messages reveal a discomfiting fact that most policymakers would rather not spell out: Al-Assad is a pariah, but he is also a convenient tool to secure and govern territory in majority-Arab cities in a complex terrain.
The situation in Syria is a contrast to Iraq, where the coalition and the Iraqi government, working hand-in-glove, appear to be on the verge of retaking the main IS group redoubt in the city of Mosul.
The Syrian government has repeatedly suggested that everyone is welcome to work with it to defeat the IS.
Syrian Legislator Mohammad Kheir Akkam questioned US support for the Kurdish-led forces, “despite the fact that the Syrian-Russian cooperation has achieved more results in combating terrorism,” while US efforts have “had the opposite result.”
The US so far has shunned any cooperation with the Syrian leader, whom Trump described as an “animal.”
Instead, it has partnered with local Kurdish and Arab forces known as the Syrian Democratic Forces, (SDF).
Those fighters are spearheading the assault on the IS group’s self-declared capital, Raqqa, in northern Syria and then face the prospect of assaulting the group’s final major stronghold to the southeast, in Deir el-Zour.
However, US support for the Kurdish-led group has angered Turkey, which views it as an extension of a Kurdish insurgency within its own territory.
The SDF is also viewed with suspicion by the predominantly Arab residents of Raqqa and Deir el-Zour.
Furthermore, the SDF, numbering about 50,000 fighters, is already risking overstretch and is in no way ready for the more challenging battle in Deir el-Zour.
Al-Assad and his Iranian allies, on the other hand, have steadily positioned themselves in key areas on the flanks of the US-led war against the IS group, grabbing territory on several fronts, including on the outskirts of Raqqa and Deir el-Zour.
With Russian and Iranian support, al-Assad has made steady gains and now controls almost all of Syria’s major cities except those held by the IS.
POWER PLAY
The symbolism was striking this week as a smiling al-Assad paid a visit to central Hama, driving his own car, and to a Russian air base in western Syria, where he posed alongside Russian generals and inside the cockpit of a Russian Su-35 fighter jet.
Syrian troops have positioned themselves on Raqqa’s southwestern flanks, and officials have vowed to retake the city eventually.
The US has insisted that the city should be handed over to a local council that would handle its administration post-liberation — and it has made clear it will not tolerate the Syrian government and its allies cashing in on the fight.
US forces recently shot down a Syrian aircraft, as well as drones believed connected to Iranian-supported forces, as tensions escalated near a base where the coalition trains Syrian rebels.
However, the senior US official said there was significant disagreement about how aggressively the US should try to prevent al-Assad from reclaiming the territory the IS group vacates, with some in the White House pushing a more forceful approach while the US Department of State and the Pentagon warn of the risks.
Keeping al-Assad’s territory to a minimum would ensure his hand is not strengthened in an eventual political deal to end the conflict, making it more likely the US could deliver on its long-standing desire to see him leave power.
Limiting his control in eastern Syria would also prevent Iranian-backed forces from securing a wide corridor through Iraq to Syria and all the way into Lebanon.
The more risk-averse voices in Trump’s administration are wary about letting the US slip into a more direct fight with al-Assad, the official said.
Dillon told reporters at the Pentagon that the US goal is to defeat the IS group wherever it exists.
NEUTRAL
If others, including the Syrian government and its Iranian and Russian allies, want to fight the extremists, “we absolutely have no problem with that,” he said.
The Atlantic Council’s Rafik Hariri Center for the Middle East director Frederic Hof said the comments reflect the narrow US view of the Syrian war, focused very specifically on the neutralization of the IS.
In the coalition view, “it is all about killing ISIS in Raqqa,” Hof wrote in an article this week, using another acronym for the extremist group.
“Creating conditions that would keep it dead? That, presumably, would be someone else’s job,” he said.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US