Launched one year ago, Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte’s brutal war on drugs has resulted in thousands of deaths, yet the street price of crystal methamphetamine in Manila has fallen and surveys show that residents are as anxious as ever about crime.
Duterte took power on June 30 last year, vowing to halt the drug abuse and lawlessness he saw as “symptoms of virulent social disease.”
Thanks to his campaign, government officials say, crime has dropped, thousands of drug dealers are behind bars, a million users have registered for treatment and future generations are being protected from the scourge of drugs.
“There are thousands of people who are being killed, yes, but there are millions who live, see?” Metro Manila Police Chief Oscar Albayalde said.
However, a growing chorus of critics, including humanrights advocates, lawyers and the nation’s influential Catholic Church, dispute the authorities’ claims of success.
They say police have summarily executed drug suspects with impunity, terrorizing poorer communities and exacerbating the very lawlessness they were meant to tackle.
“This president behaves as if he is above the law — that he is the law,” wrote Amado Picardal, an outspoken priest, in an article for a Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines publication. “He has ignored the rule of law and human rights.”
The drug war’s exact death toll is hotly disputed, with critics saying the toll is far above the 5,000 that police have identified as either drug-related killings or suspects shot dead during police operations.
Most victims are small-time users and dealers, while the masterminds behind the lucrative drug trade are largely unknown and at large, critics of Duterte’s ruthless methods say.
If the strategy was working, the laws of economics suggest the price of crystal methamphetamine, the highly addictive drug also known as shabu, should be rising as less supply hits the streets, but the Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency’s own data suggest shabu has become even cheaper in Manila.
In July last year, 1 gram cost 1,200 to 11,000 pesos (US$24 to US$220), according to the agency’s figures.
Last month, 1 gram cost 1,000 to 15,000 pesos, it said.
The wide ranges reflect swings in availability and sharp regional variations.
Officials say Manila’s street prices are at the lowest end of the range and that has come down, albeit by just a couple of hundred pesos.
“If prices have fallen, it’s an indication that enforcement actions have not been effective,” said Gloria Lai of the International Drug Policy Consortium, a global network of non-governmental organizations focused on narcotics.
The problem is that while nine domestic drug laboratories have been busted, shabu smuggled in from overseas has filled the market gap, Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency spokesman Derrick Carreon said.
“Demand needs to be addressed because there are still drug smugglers,” Carreon said.
While smuggled shabu has kept the price down in the capital, the official data show the price has gone up in the already substantially more expensive far-flung regions, such as the insurgency-racked southern island of Mindanao.
Duterte declared martial law in Mindanao last month after militants inspired by the Islamic State group stormed Marawi City and the army’s failure to retake the city quickly has dented the president’s image as a law-and-order leader.
Surveys by Social Weather Stations (SWS), a leading Manila pollster, reveal a public broadly supportive of Duterte’s anti-drug campaign, but troubled by its methods and dubious about its effectiveness.
SWS surveys in each of the first three quarters of Duterte’s rule showed a “very high satisfaction” rate with the anti-drug campaign, SWS senior researcher Leo Laroza said.
In the most recent survey, published in April, 92 percent said it was important that drug suspects be captured alive.
Respondents also reported a 6.3 percent rise in street robberies and break-ins.
More than half of those polled said they were afraid to venture out at night, a proportion that had barely changed since the drug war began, Laroza said.
“People still have this fear when it comes to their neighborhoods,” he said. “It has not gone down.”
Public and police perceptions of crime levels seem to diverge.
The number of crimes committed in the first nine months of Duterte’s rule has dropped by 30 percent, according to police statistics cited by the president’s communications team.
Albayalde said people, particularly in Manila, felt safer now, especially due to a crackdown on drug users, who he said commit most of the crime.
In the first 11 months of Duterte’s rule, police say 3,155 suspects were shot dead in anti-drug operations.
Critics maintain that many of them were summarily executed.
Police say they have investigated a further 2,000 drug-related killings, and have yet to identify a motive in at least another 7,000 murders and homicides.
Human-rights monitors believe many of these victims were killed by undercover police officers or their paid vigilantes, a charge the police deny.
For residents of Navotas Fish Port, a warren of shacks near Manila’s docks, the body count is too high. There were nine killings in a single night in Navotas earlier this month, according to local media.
In the middle of last month, resident Mary Joy Royo said, a dozen gunmen arrived on motorbikes and abducted her mother and stepfather.
Their corpses were found later with execution-style gunshots to the head and torso.
“They should be targeting the drug lords,” Royo said. “The victims of the drug war are the poor people.”
As the death toll has risen, so has domestic and international outrage.
In October last year, The Hague-based International Criminal Court said it could investigate the killings if they were “committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack against a civilian population.”
Police operations were halted for much of February after it emerged that anti-drug police abducted and killed a South Korean businessman last year, but the outcry over the rising body count has rarely slowed the killing or led to prosecutions.
The Philippine Commission on Human Rights is investigating 680 drug-war killings.
“In this country the basic problem is impunity,” commission chairman Chito Gascon said. “No one is ever held to account for the worst violations. Ever.”
Albayalde says that the force’s Internal Affairs Service (IAS) investigates all allegations of abuse by his officers.
“We do not tolerate senseless killings,” he said. “We do not just kill anybody.”
The IAS said it had investigated 1,912 drug-related cases and recommended 159 officers for dismissal due to misconduct during anti-drug operations, although it did not know whether any had yet been dismissed.
Earlier this month, 19 police officers charged with murdering two drug suspects in their jail cell in November last year were released on bail and now face trial for the lesser crime of homicide.
Duterte, who has repeatedly urged police to kill drug suspects, had already vowed to pardon the officers if they were convicted.
“You have a head of state who says: ‘Kill, kill, kill,’ a head of state who says: ‘I’ve got your back,’” Gascon said. “That has a ripple effect.”
Additional reporting by Neil Jerome Morales
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers