Normalization of Taiwan
A recent poll shows that 90 percent of the public is in favor of the normalization of Taiwan. This normalization is long overdue.
There is a common domestic and international consensus that Taiwan is a sovereign, independent nation and it is not a part of China. “One China” is a myth and independence is a fact.
Chinese leaders do not need to be upset whenever they hear the term “independence.” Independence has been with Taiwan for decades if not longer. Taiwanese do not have to shy away from being independent.
From now on when President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) visits the US or other nations, she should take EVA Air instead of China Airlines, which has caused confusion and misunderstanding.
Taiwanese do not want to be represented by China.
On the other hand, Chinese leaders consider that the Republic of China (ROC) has been destroyed and cannot represent China.
Taiwan should adopt anno Domini (AD) instead of the ROC calendar in numbering years. This adoption would be consistent with the international convention and would save Taiwanese time doing conversions.
In August, when the Summer Universiade is to be held in Taipei, the nation’s team should be called “Taiwan” rather than “Chinese Taipei” since Taiwan is not Chinese and Taiwan is much larger than Taipei.
In September, Taiwan should officially apply for regular membership in the UN General Assembly even if China tries to block it. The “ROC” should not be used, since the UN Security Council membership and the UN General Assembly membership of the historical ROC have been replaced by China.
These are some initial steps that can be taken to normalize Taiwan in the world.
Charles Hong
Columbus, Ohio
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers