Pursuing a respectable national image is as crucial as securing immediate national interests in global politics. This is particularly true for Taiwan and China in the latest international climate change negotiations.
At a time when the global balance of power appears to be shifting in China’s favor, Beijing is keen to soften its international image as a responsible actor, foster its soft power and limit the fear of a “China threat” in the worldwide media.
As the US withdrew from the Paris agreement, it immediately created a leadership vacuum in global climate diplomacy. The major challenge to the US is that China is now in a stronger position to shape the flourishing world of “green” energy.
In comparison to the US, China has launched an ambitious strategy of climate negotiations to advance its independent agenda and grow its clean energy industry.
Rhetorically, China frames the challenge of climate change as a global concern that affects everyone, demanding full cooperation between the developed and developing nations.
Global warming badly affects China. Many densely populated cities are situated in coastal regions vulnerable to weather-related risks. Therefore, Beijing perceives environmental protection as compatible with poverty relief and socioeconomic development.
China holds technological advancement as the key to the success of climate protection. By identifying itself as part of the developing world, China appeals to the US and Europe for sharing the latest “green” energy innovations, even though it has little in common with African and Latin American nations in need of foreign support.
Yet, the “developing world” or “Third World” rhetoric makes it morally indefensible for the West to deny the global south’s request for advanced technological assistance.
Most importantly, China considers its climate policy as part of its energy security.
Beijing used to be only concerned about energy supply and overlooked the need for energy sustainability.
However, the proportion of renewable energy is growing rapidly in the Chinese domestic energy market and energy conservation is thought to be of primary significance in the official thinking.
Embracing advanced hydropower and nuclear reactors to reduce reliance on imported fossil fuels, China is closing ineffective power plants in major cities. It is also intensifying its efforts to reduce pollution and promote the production of energy-efficient products.
These gestures indicate Beijing’s determination to enter the “green” energy game and develop a technologically driven economy.
Regrettably, China confuses climate protection with geopolitical rivalry and its environmental sensitivity does not extend to Taiwan. On many occasions, it denied Taiwan the opportunity to take part in the global climate change dialogue.
Compared with China, Taiwan, under President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), is far more determined to resolve energy insecurity and make the nation nuclear-free by 2025.
Although Taiwan demonstrates a remarkable record of reducing greenhouse gas emissions and developing its “green” industry, it is not allowed to make its voice heard and share its experience in global multilateral platforms.
Perhaps one feasible way out of the China-imposed isolation is to build scientific and business collaborations with clean energy sectors worldwide. Only by doing so will the nation be able to position itself as a cooperative player in dealing with the problem of climate change.
Joseph Tse-Hei Lee is professor of history at Pace University in New York City.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US