Environmental campaigners take to the streets in protest almost daily, but few pay them any heed — people have become desensitized. The government is rarely willing to act in defiance of lobbyists and economic interests; it is only willing to do so when public protest is too strong to be ignored. This is why passionate environmentalists who rouse public interest are so important if we are to protect our living environment.
Aerial photographs taken by late documentary film director Chi Po-lin (齊柏林) that showed destructive mining activities in Hualien inspired more than 150,000 people to sign a petition. The government was forced to act, resolving on Wednesday to amend the Mining Act (礦業法) to require mine operators to undergo renewed environmental impact assessments. However, most environmental protests in the nation fail to achieve this level of success, largely because they fail to capture public interest.
In November last year, members of Citizens of the Earth, Taiwan and other civic groups protested against construction at an agricultural park in Kaohsiung’s Sinyuan Township (新園), saying the work was destroying 4,000-year-old Dabenkeng (大坌坑) cultural deposits.
City inspectors told protesters they found no evidence of damage to the site, despite protesters saying they had evidence to the contrary.
In March, protests against construction on agricultural land in Changhua County were ignored, with protesters on March 28 saying that construction continued despite promises of action by the Executive Yuan. Photographs showed new factories being built in the county’s Lugang (鹿港) and Luan (鹿安) townships.
On Sunday last week, Anti-Air Pollution Alliance members marched in Yunlin County’s Douliou City (斗六), urging the county government not to renew permits for Formosa Petrochemical Corp’s coal-fired power plants.
The government renewed all 12 permits, but signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with the company, pledging to convert three of the coal-fired power generators into gas-fired facilities by 2025.
Alliance director Yeh Guang-peng (葉光芃) questioned the MOU’s effectiveness and said converting the plants should not take eight years.
Yunlin Environmental Protection Bureau Director Lin Chang-tsao (林長造) said the county needed the support from the central government.
Whether unwilling to act out of concern over upsetting lobbyists or due to a lack of cooperation between departments, the government is unlikely to act on environmental protests unless they have significant public support.
Companies in Taiwan tend to claim “negligence” when caught violating environmental regulations — an offense for which they are not heavily penalized.
Authorities generally do not push the issue further unless there is a public uproar.
A pollution case in which Advanced Semiconductor Engineering Inc was found dumping nickel-laced effluent into Kaohsiung’s Houjin River (後勁溪) in 2013 could not be ignored by prosecutors after it drew the attention of 50 environmental non-governmental organizations in 18 nations.
The city government said last week that it would re-examine the evidence and impose higher penalties.
However, while the majority of cases are unlikely to garner such international support, at the very least this month’s amendments to the Mining Act show that public pressure can push the government to act in the interest of environmental protection.
Chi’s achievements can not have been for nothing. Someone must pick up the torch and highlight environmental issues in a way that tugs at heartstrings and captures the public’s imagination in the way that Chi’s films and aerial photography did.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers