There were some encouraging — and reassuring — words and actions from the hearings held this week by the US House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Committee.
The first came from US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, who appeared before the committee on Wednesday to answer questions about the US’ foreign policy budget for the 2018 fiscal year.
After US Representative Steve Chabot raised the issue of Panama breaking ties with Taiwan because of pressure from China, Tillerson said the lawmaker had reminded him of the need to make it clear to Beijing that the US is committed to Taiwan.
While the administration of US President Donald Trump is in discussions with Beijing about the direction of the US-China relationship for the next 50 years, it is important for Washington to fulfill its commitments to Taiwan, Tillerson said.
The following day, the House Foreign Affairs subcommittee on Asia and the Pacific held a hearing entitled “Renewing Assurances: Strengthening US-Taiwan Ties.”
Committee chairman Ed Royce opened the hearing by saying that it was “more important than ever” to reassure Taiwan of Washington’s commitment to the relationship.
Royce and other US lawmakers were also critical of delays by previous US administrations of arms sales to Taiwan.
While US Representative Brad Sherman said Taiwan should not be used as a bargaining chip in US-China relations, US Representative Ted Yoho criticized the manipulation of arms sales, saying the efforts to avoid causing friction with Beijing had given China influence over the arms sales process.
One of the people testifying at the hearing, former US Department of Defense senior director for China, Taiwan and Mongolia Dan Blumenthal, urged Trump to include Taiwan in its Asia-Pacific strategy.
As for the much-vaunted question of whether Taiwan would be able to buy Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II jets from the US, which Minister of National Defense Feng Shih-kuan (馮世寬) said in April would be raised next month when ministry officials visit Washington, Blumenthal said the key issue was whether Taiwan could afford the aircraft’s “exorbitant costs” when there are other options available.
Perhaps the highlight of Thursday’s hearing was the subcommittee unanimously passing the Taiwan Travel Act, submitted by Chabot and cosponsored by Royce and Sherman, aimed at eliminating the restrictions on high-level visits between Taiwan and the US.
The bill goes to the full committee for approval and its chances for passage appear good, as it has support from Republican and Democratic lawmakers — as does a similar bill in the US Senate, which was introduced by three Republican senators and three of their Democratic colleagues.
President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) yesterday tweeted her appreciation of the remarks by Tillerson and other US officials and the continued support of friends in the US, Japan and other nations.
The government should do more than just tweet some words. The administration of former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) was often at such pains to cozy up to China in pursuit of cross-strait ties that it distanced itself from the US and Japan, which have been the nation’s strongest and most supportive allies for decades, so Tsai’s government needs to make it clear just how much it values their friendship.
However, it should also take Blumenthal’s comments about arms costs to heart in preparing for next month’s mission to Washington.
If the Trump administration is preparing an arms sales offer to Taipei, as wire agencies and other media have been speculating for several months, the government should ensure that what it asks for — and what it is offered — are feasible, politically and financially.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers