US President Donald Trump has announced that the US will no longer participate in the 2015 Paris climate agreement, the landmark UN treaty that many of us worked so hard to achieve. Trump is making a mistake that will have grave repercussions for his own country, and for the world.
Trump claims that he will try to renegotiate the deal reached in Paris, or craft a new one. However, leaders from around the world have already hailed the agreement as a breakthrough for the fight against climate change, a victory for international cooperation and a boon to the global economy. That remains true today.
Among the many challenges we face today, climate change is unique in its global scale. It affects every element of life on this planet — from ecosystems and food production to cities and industrial supply chains.
Viewing climate change as strictly an “environmental” problem misses the point entirely.
We might charitably assume that Trump simply does not understand the implications of his decision. Yet, regardless of what Trump thinks, we know that he is surrounded by advisers who know very well what is at stake.
On the campaign trail, Trump promised to create jobs and protect US workers from the ravages of the world. He signed off his tweet announcing that he had made a decision on the Paris accord with: “MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!”
However, Trump’s decision undermines every one of these goals, and it goes against the wishes of a vast majority of Americans, including many of his own supporters.
By turning his back on the Paris agreement, he is increasing Americans’ exposure to the devastating effects of climate change — many of which they are already experiencing. Moreover, he is undercutting jobs in the thriving renewable energy and electric vehicle sectors, which are increasingly employing the very workers he purports to represent.
More broadly, Trump has diminished the US itself and abdicated its global leadership role. When I was a member of the French government participating in a global tour to build consensus for climate action — an effort that eventually culminated in the Paris agreement — I experienced firsthand what US leadership can achieve. It is tragic to watch that force for good be subverted by denial and myopia.
By burying their heads in the sand, Trump and his advisers must be hoping that reality will simply go away. They have somehow concluded that the US will be spared from the droughts already destroying farms in California’s Central Valley; the rising sea levels already flooding coastal cities; the storms and wildfires routinely ravaging vast swathes of the US countryside; and the water and food supply disruptions that threaten us all.
Other parties to the Paris agreement have responded to Trump’s decision with strength, thus proving the resilience of the agreement itself. The rest of the world will be sad to see a US that has been left behind, owing to Trump’s decision, but we will not wait; in fact, we are already moving on.
The world’s response will be clear at the G20 meeting in Germany next month. Already, Europe, China, India, Canada, and Pacific Rim and South American countries have recommitted to the goals of the Paris agreement. These countries understand the dangers of climate change, as do ExxonMobil’s global shareholders, who, just this week, rejected the company’s attempts to ignore the impact of climate change on its business.
By placing the US in the company of the only two countries that have not joined the Paris agreement — Syria and Nicaragua — Trump’s decision is completely at odds with the current global atmosphere of cooperation. The world’s major economies are reaching new agreements every day to collaborate on research and development, infrastructure investment and industrial strategy. They are working together to achieve a low-carbon economy and to make 2020 the year that global greenhouse gas emissions will have peaked.
European leaders are already meeting with their Indian and Chinese counterparts to find areas where they can cooperate on developing clean energy and “green” infrastructure.
Massive investments will be made in these areas and the European Central Bank, the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank and many other institutions are devising mechanisms to finance them. Likewise, sovereign wealth funds with immense clout in the global financial system are redirecting their investments toward the “green” economy.
Even the most optimistic among us did not predict that the old fossil fuel paradigm would change so quickly, but Europe is phasing out coal-fueled energy production, and India, China and South Korea are rapidly shifting their investments away from coal and toward renewable energy sources.
Worldwide, the competition is about “who can go green the fastest.” New industries are springing up, at scale, in areas ranging from electrification and smart grid design to electric vehicles, green construction and recycling technologies and organic chemicals.
The renewable energy revolution, now spreading at an unprecedented rate, is already transforming entire sectors, not least transportation. In all of these sectors around the world, the excitement and growth potential is palpable.
It is a shame that Trump has decided to shirk the US’ global responsibility and turn his back on these developments. His decision is a blow to so many people — including a great many Americans — who have worked hard to be a successful part of the new economy.
Still, Trump cannot take all of the US with him. State and city-level climate action is sweeping across the nation, increasing in scale and ambition. Trump’s historic mistake represents an obstacle to that collective action, but it can hardly stop it.
Just as Chinese companies are now training US coal workers to build wind farms, the rest of the world will continue to work together and build the markets and workforce of the future.
Laurence Tubiana, a former French ambassador to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, is chief executive of the European Climate Foundation and a professor at the Paris Institute of Political Studies.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US