That the former Association of East Asian Relations has been renamed the Taiwan-Japan Relations Association indicates a subtle, yet important change in the relationship between the two nations.
The juxtaposition of Taiwan next to Japan in the organization’s official name suggests that Taiwan is now finally being treated as an equal by Japan. Taiwanese welcomed the change, as it is a gesture of Japanese goodwill.
However, the progress is also due in large part to the hard work of the Democratic Progressive Party, which deserves applause from the general public.
The name change is especially significant when viewed in relation to the Treaty of San Francisco, which came into force 65 years ago, as it marks the first time Japan has established a meaningful relationship with the nation since it renounced sovereignty over Taiwan and the Penghu archipelago.
In this new relationship, Taiwan is no longer treated simply as part of a country or only included when “East Asia” is mentioned.
Following the name change, China expressed its dissatisfaction. However, it should be lodging its complaints with the Russians, who inadvertently helped confirm the terms in the San Francisco Treaty that made Japan renounce its sovereignty over Taiwan and Penghu, without conceding them to China, in a failed attempt to ensure that Beijing would take over them.
At the San Francisco conference, the Soviet Union proposed a different version of the treaty, which specified that Taiwan and Penghu, along with Manchuria, the Pratas Islands (Dongsha Islands, 東沙群島), Paracel Islands (Xisha Islands, 西沙群島) and the Spratly Islands (Nansha Islands, 南沙群島) would be ceded to China. However, the proposal was vetoed.
The treaty that was eventually passed was the original version, which simply states that Japan would renounce its sovereignty over the territories. The final version does not say the territories would be ceded to China and therefore does not acknowledge China’s sovereignty over them.
Due to pressure from the US, Japan signed a bilateral agreement with the government of Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) based on the San Francisco Treaty. It then established diplomatic relations with the People’s Republic of China and claimed that it respects and understands Beijing’s position on Taiwan.
However, it has continued to conduct exchanges with Taiwan in the name of improving cooperation across East Asia. Nevertheless, it was not until this time that Japan finally established a proper one-on-one relationship with Taiwan.
In recent years, several pro-unification parties and groups, influenced by China’s anti-Japan policies, have been doing all they can to incite anti-Japan sentiment in Taiwan. Many of them have been trying to demonize Tokyo by exaggerating the risks of importing Japanese food products.
However, their tactics will not stand up to scientific scrutiny and the public will eventually see through them.
In addition to their shared democratic values and close trade relationship, Taiwan and Japan share the responsibilities of maintaining peace and security in East Asia.
Due to those reasons, the two have naturally developed a good rapport. The name change is the first step toward normalizing the relationship between the two nations.
Taiwan and Japan should continue to work on normalizing their relations, both legally as well as in a de facto sense.
James Wang is a media commentator.
Translated by Tu Yu-an
Chinese actor Alan Yu (于朦朧) died after allegedly falling from a building in Beijing on Sept. 11. The actor’s mysterious death was tightly censored on Chinese social media, with discussions and doubts about the incident quickly erased. Even Hong Kong artist Daniel Chan’s (陳曉東) post questioning the truth about the case was automatically deleted, sparking concern among overseas Chinese-speaking communities about the dark culture and severe censorship in China’s entertainment industry. Yu had been under house arrest for days, and forced to drink with the rich and powerful before he died, reports said. He lost his life in this vicious
A recent trio of opinion articles in this newspaper reflects the growing anxiety surrounding Washington’s reported request for Taiwan to shift up to 50 percent of its semiconductor production abroad — a process likely to take 10 years, even under the most serious and coordinated effort. Simon H. Tang (湯先鈍) issued a sharp warning (“US trade threatens silicon shield,” Oct. 4, page 8), calling the move a threat to Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” which he argues deters aggression by making Taiwan indispensable. On the same day, Hsiao Hsi-huei (蕭錫惠) (“Responding to US semiconductor policy shift,” Oct. 4, page 8) focused on
George Santayana wrote: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This article will help readers avoid repeating mistakes by examining four examples from the civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forces and the Republic of China (ROC) forces that involved two city sieges and two island invasions. The city sieges compared are Changchun (May to October 1948) and Beiping (November 1948 to January 1949, renamed Beijing after its capture), and attempts to invade Kinmen (October 1949) and Hainan (April 1950). Comparing and contrasting these examples, we can learn how Taiwan may prevent a war with
In South Korea, the medical cosmetic industry is fiercely competitive and prices are low, attracting beauty enthusiasts from Taiwan. However, basic medical risks are often overlooked. While sharing a meal with friends recently, I heard one mention that his daughter would be going to South Korea for a cosmetic skincare procedure. I felt a twinge of unease at the time, but seeing as it was just a casual conversation among friends, I simply reminded him to prioritize safety. I never thought that, not long after, I would actually encounter a patient in my clinic with a similar situation. She had
RSS