In a world riddled with growing isolationism and protectionism, China has doubled its efforts to promote the “One Belt, One Road” initiative — also known as the new Silk Road — as a global vision of power projection and a comprehensive strategy of national development.
Appropriating the historical metaphor, the “Silk Road Economic Belt” means a variety of continental railroads and highways, oil and natural gas pipelines, and numerous China-funded transnational infrastructure projects that spread from Xian to the Gobi Desert and Central Asia and eventually Europe.
As a seaborne equivalent, the “21st century Maritime Silk Road” is composed of many carefully planned ports and terminals that radiate from the South China Sea through the Indian Ocean to East Africa.
The “One Belt, One Road” initiative has several policy components. As an aspirational power, Beijing favors a global framework that relies on the mechanisms of diplomatic negotiation to resolve intra and inter-state disputes, as opposed to Washington’s preference for a security system based on coercive force.
This geopolitical thinking is in line with Beijing’s rhetoric about its peaceful rise, meaning that a powerful China would not threaten its neighbors, as the West did during the heyday of imperialism.
However, neighboring countries worry about China’s enormous energies and growing military influence.
On the economic front, the developing world is fascinated by the Chinese principles of diplomatic non-intervention, authoritarian governance and modernization through intensive labor industries.
China always prides itself on its slow process of governance change as a potential result of, not a wishful precondition for, economic growth and progress. It has positioned itself as a model of state-controlled development because the country embraced modernization from a status inferior to that of the West and Japan.
To advance this authoritarian mode of development, Beijing founded the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank to support major infrastructure investment projects and formulated bilateral trading agreements with East, Southeast and Central Asian nations.
With its huge market, China is keen to create a “win-win” situation for neighboring states in the name of “mutual benefits” and “commonly-shared destinies.” The objective is to integrate neighboring economies into a Sino-centric order.
The extent to which this development would give rise to a Chinese economic union in Asia and whether Beijing’s influence would decline in the event of an economic slowdown is debatable, but China has effectively replaced the US as the largest trading partner of many Asian states.
Furthermore, China has implemented a pragmatic policy of mercantilism that links diplomatic and economic activities together. Many “One Belt, One Road” countries are becoming reliable resource suppliers and modest consumers of Chinese manufactured goods. By investing in these nations, China is determined to co-opt their political and economic elites, winning oil and natural gas deals and finding new markets for its products.
The key question for national leaders is how to accommodate a rising China without alienating the US and Russia. Evidently the local ruling elites are as calculative and pragmatic as their Chinese counterparts. They would simply align with China for immediate gains and maintain a collegial relationship with the US and Russia.
On the whole, the reasoning behind this global vision displays a great deal of pragmatism and opportunism in the Chinese grand strategy. In particular, China has given out countless amounts of financial aid that no other country could match.
Most Chinese investors in the “One Belt, One Road” countries are state-owned enterprises with strong government support. They are willing to make long term and risky business decisions, rather than pursue financial gains.
Undoubtedly, China’s political, economic and strategic clout has weakened US ties with longstanding allies such as the Philippines and South Korea. Given the remarkable outcomes of the “One Belt, One Road” initiative and the tendency of US President Donald Trump to cede influence in parts of Asia to China, it is time for Taiwan to articulate a coherent and effective counter strategy.
President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) “new southbound policy” has marked a good beginning of resetting Taiwan’s regional diplomacy and improving bilateral links through trade and development. Yet, much needs to be done to enhance the nation’s humanistic ties with global and regional civil society networks.
Only by doing so would it be possible to rebrand Taiwan as a feasible model of democratic governance, sustainable development and a knowledge-driven economy.
Joseph Tse-Hei Lee is professor of history at Pace University in New York City.
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past