The British government has been accused of “running scared” of diesel drivers and attempting to bully judges over its last-minute bid to delay the publication of its clean air plan.
Politicians and environmental groups said ministers were “hiding behind the election” to justify delaying publication of the government’s long-awaited proposals instead of tackling the nation’s air pollution crisis.
Health experts said the lack of government action had potentially put thousands of lives at risk.
“It is frankly outrageous that the government thinks it can continue to bury its head in the sand about the serious health impacts of air quality in London and across the country,” London Mayor Sadiq Khan said. “The prime minister has once again missed this golden opportunity to show real leadership in tackling and improving the air we breathe, which should have been done well before the pre-election period.”
The government had been under a court direction to produce tougher draft measures to tackle illegal levels of nitrogen dioxide pollution — largely caused by diesel traffic — by 4pm on Monday. The original plans had been dismissed by judges as so poor as to be unlawful.
However, after the announcement by British Prime Minister Theresa May of a general election on June 8, ministers lodged a lengthy application to the court late on Friday last week. It asked judges to allow them to breach the Monday deadline to “comply with pre-election propriety rules.”
British Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Andrea Leadsom was summoned to parliament on Monday to answer urgent questions.
Cabinet Office guidance says that purdah rules can be lifted in exceptional circumstances, including for consultations on safeguarding public health.
During the debate, Leadsom was asked if she considered toxic air to be an “emergency” — as it was blamed for up to 40,000 early deaths every year.
In reply she only acknowledged that it was a “very significant and urgent concern,” refusing to use the word “emergency.”
She said she was “personally deeply committed to the importance of ensuring clean air,” but had been told by officials in the Cabinet Office that it would breach purdah rules to publish the plans in the run-up to the election.
The government has applied to publish draft plans on June 30, followed by the full policy in September, she said.
Leadsom, who also said that it was the second application to delay publication that her department had submitted to the courts, insisted the move would not postpone the roll out of the proposals.
Labour shadow environment secretary Sue Hayman said the government’s actions were unacceptable.
“The situation has gone from bad to worse on this government’s watch and has now escalated into what the DEFRA committee calls an public health emergency,” she said, referring to the Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs.
“It is unacceptable to hide behind the election to delay publishing her plans. Cabinet Office rules are clear that purdah is not an excuse to delay acting in vital public health matters,” she added.
“The government is trying to bully judges into backing off. Ministers should not be playing games with people’s health, especially children’s,” Mary Creagh, Labour chair of the House of Commons’ environment audit committee, said in a statement.
The government’s plans are likely to include a package of measures to make diesel cars less popular. These could include a diesel scrappage scheme, a hike in vehicle excise duty for diesel vehicles and possible congestion charging zones in some cities.
Green Party coleader Caroline Lucas said the government’s failure to publish its plans suggested it was running scared of the diesel lobby and diesel drivers ahead of the election.
Ministers had “utterly failed to get a grip on the air pollution crisis,” she added.
“[It] is now attempting to stitch up judges and cajole them into submission. Such blatant bullying is simply unacceptable,” she said.
Lawyers from the environmental law group ClientEarth, which successfully took the government to court over its air quality plans, were still waiting to hear back from the court when Monday’s deadline passed.
“The unacceptable last-minute nature of the government’s application late on Friday night, after the court had closed, has meant that we have spent the weekend considering our response,” ClientEarth chief executive James Thornton said. “We are still examining our next steps. This is a question of public health and not of politics, and for that reason we believe that the plans should be put in place without delay.”
The next move is in the hands of the judges in the case. It is thought likely that in the next few days they will ask ClientEarth to respond to the government’s application. A hearing will then be called at which they will decide whether to back the government’s proposed delay.
The scale of the air pollution crisis was revealed in a joint Guardian-Greenpeace investigation this month showing hundreds of thousands of children were being educated within 150m of a road where levels of nitrogen dioxide from diesel traffic breached legal limits.
Last week, figures obtained by Labour showed that more than 38 million people, representing 59.3 percent of the UK population, were living in areas where levels of nitrogen dioxide pollution were above legal limits.
Research consistently shows that exposure to traffic fumes is harmful to children and adults. Children are more vulnerable because their lungs are still developing and exposure to nitrogen dioxide reduces lung growth, causes long-term ill health and can result in premature death.
British Lung Foundation chief executive Penny Woods said that potentially thousands of premature deaths might have been avoided if the government had acted sooner.
“The government’s failure to produce a new air quality plan aimed at reducing the nation’s toxic air is a huge disappointment. It has been two years since the first court case. It would be fair to say that the equivalent of 80,000 early deaths could have been reduced in this time,” Woods said.
Nitrogen dioxide emissions from diesel traffic cause 23,500 of the 40,000 premature deaths from air pollution each year, DEFRA figures show.
In April last year, lawmakers said air pollution was a public health emergency.
On Monday, a DEFRA spokesman said: “We are seeking an extension to comply with pre-election propriety rules.”
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers