Earlier this month, Pxmart Co Ltd president Hsu Chung-jen (徐重仁) commented on the issue of low wages among Taiwan’s young people and accused them of spending more money than other age groups, triggering a strong backlash online.
Some people said Hsu lacked sympathy for young Taiwanese and their way of life, while others said he seemed to have the mindset of a demanding boss who is only good at pointing fingers at others.
Aware of the potential consequences of such a backlash to his business, the retail veteran later posted an apology on Facebook, saying that he should not pass judgement too quickly on the younger generation and that he had decided to speak less and listen more.
Regardless of whether Hsu should make an apology over his personal opinion and whether his observation was wrong, the matter has sparked further discussion among the public about the problems of stagnant wage growth and widening inequality in the nation.
Discussions about low wages and the wealth gap have been going on for many years. Policymakers from both major parties have repeatedly vowed to use all available resources to address these problems. However, apart from hapless attempts to morally persuade Taiwan’s employers, the government has done little to alleviate people’s concerns.
Data about median wages in the nation’s industrial and service sectors released by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) late last month showed that the situation is worsening.
The overall median wage last year declined 0.6 percent from a year earlier to NT$40,612 per month, which means that about half of the nation’s employees earned less than NT$40,000 per month. As the median wage for last year was lower than the average wage of NT$48,790 and the gap between the two figures widened from NT$6,026 in 2009 to NT$7,673 in 2015 and to NT$8,178 last year, it is clear that income inequality is growing.
The ratio of median to average wages last year dropped to 83.24 percent from 84.25 percent the previous year, the lowest level since the 2008 global financial crisis. This is another sign that the distribution is skewed toward low wages.
The DGBAS last week pointed to the relocation of local manufacturers to other nations as the main cause of low wages. As the high-paying manufacturing base is shrinking, while the number of low-paying retail and food service jobs is rapidly increasing, it is hardly surprising that wage level growth has nearly stalled over the past 16 years, the DGBAS said.
However, the problem of low wages involves a complicated set of factors and the DGBAS’ reasoning only relates to changes in the nation’s economic structure and social development in the past two decades.
The problems could originate from businesses’ legitimate concerns over taxes, environmental rules, labor competitiveness and other cost issues, but to some extent, it could also be blamed on corporations’ greed and selfishness, exploitation in the workplace or distortions in the labor market.
The government has failed to put enough pressure on businesses for too long.
The nation’s flawed political mechanism is a cause for concern, slowing down policymaking, limiting the scope and effectiveness of relevant policies and making scant progress in fostering an environment where companies have better access to investment funds and can stay profitable — and willing to offer higher pay.
We often hear people say that it will take some time to transform the nation’s economic structure and upgrade its industrial sector, but nothing will happen unless all of us get down to work.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers