Of the many reasons British Prime Minister Theresa May supplied for calling a general election, the Conservative leader provided one particularly important one. She believes she still needs to convince her European counterparts that Brexit does indeed mean Brexit.
A Brexit mandate, delivering a large Conservative Commons majority, would sweep away the last hope that that the UK’s referendum decision in June last year could be reversed.
On this basis, a resounding majority for May would remove any motive for the EU negotiators to make the UK’s Brexit terms as unpalatable as possible in the belief that it would help UK voters realize the terms of Brexit are just too painful to accept.
It is true that among parts of the EU leadership and the European public, there remains a lingering belief — something more than wistful regret — that the British people can be helped to change their mind.
Even though Article 50 has been triggered, many EU lawyers believe a legal route is available for Britain to revoke Brexit, probably through a Commons vote in the winter of next year.
This belief that the UK made the wrong decision and can yet be persuaded not to go through with it, gripped Europe’s leadership from the start.
German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s chief of staff, Peter Altmaier, in the immediate wake of the referendum said that politicians in London “should have the possibility to reconsider the consequences of an exit.”
There is, after all, a long European history of second EU referendums in the wake of “incorrect results,” including in Ireland and France.
As recently as last month, European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker said he hoped the UK would rejoin the EU.
“The day will come when the UK will re-enter the EU boat,” he said.
The European Parliament’s chief negotiator, Guy Verhofstadt, in a speech in Brussels predicted that young Britons would come to see the referendum as a “catfight in the Conservative Party that got out of hand” and described Brexit as “a loss of time, a waste of energy, stupidity.”
EU Council President Donald Tusk has said he would be the happiest man alive if Britain decided to think again.
“After the decision in the UK we have to respect the decision of the referendum,” he said. “If it is reversible or not, this is in the British hands. I would be the happiest one if it [reversed], but we now have to start our formal works.”
Even France, the country most willing to impose tough Brexit terms, believes the UK only voted as it did due to the “lies of Brexiteers.”
French Minister of Foreign Affairs Jean-Marc Ayrault was blunt enough about British Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs Boris Johnson.
“You know very well what his style and method are,” Ayrault said of his British counterpart. “During the [Brexit] campaign, you know he told a lot of lies to the British people and now it is him who has his back against the wall.”
In response, former British commissioner to the EU Lord Hill said: “I think there is a surprisingly widely held view that Britain might still decide to stay in. And I think that partly explains why previously Donald Tusk has talked about it as hard Brexit or no exit.”
“I think they also believe when people start to look at the practical consequences of disentangling ourselves from this very complicated relationship, then maybe we will think again,” he said.
The European media coverage of the UK’s Brexit debate fuels the belief that the UK could change its mind. That coverage often focuses on the pro-European demonstrations, the divisions between the Brexiters and any spotty signs that the UK economy is being damaged.
Lengthy interviews with figures such as Nick Clegg appear in the German press, such as Handelsblatt, or with Sadiq Khan in Le Monde.
The speeches by former British prime minister Tony Blair explicitly calling for the remain camp to keep open the options of the UK remaining in the EU have been given generous coverage.
UK negotiators, including some in the Cabinet, believe this European mindset could make the negotiations more difficult, and this lurking, hidden agenda would reduce the EU’s will to compromise.
If May wins a large Commons majority, the lingering hope that Britain will change its mind will be dashed. There will instead be a double democratic lock — a narrow referendum decision affirmed in a comprehensive general election verdict.
UK officials believe this double mandate will lead the EU not to play games, but accept the best solution is to reach a mutually agreeable, long-term trading relationship.
Any EU motive to erect artificial roadblocks over the sequencing of the talks, the Brexit divorce costs, or passporting rights would be reduced.
The initial signs suggested Europe had got the message.
Norbert Rottgen, a member of Merkel’s conservatives and head of the German Parliament’s Foreign Affairs Committee, said the decision to go for an election meant the chances of a reversal of the UK decision would be reduced.
“Hopes for an exit from Brexit are completely unfounded. For the first time the prime minister is programmatically committing the Tories to Brexit,” he said.
However, Britain’s hope that it will change the European view might prove wrong. Experience shows the EU does not necessarily crumble when faced by negotiators armed with a fresh mandate from their people.
In 2015, Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tspiras, leader of the leftist SYRIZA party, called a referendum and a snap election in a bid to give himself extra bargaining clout in the bailout talks, and little good it did him.
The overwhelming EU view remains that the UK must not be seen to benefit from any decision to leave the EU, whether that decision is taken by referendum or by an election.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US