Last month, the home of a resident of Taipei’s Changan W Road who had not agreed to an urban renewal project was torn down after the developer said the building was dangerous. The Taipei City Government demolished the building in accordance with the Building Act (建築法). The man then pressed charges of influence peddling against the city’s Department of Urban Development commissioner and wrote an article saying that Article 34 of the Urban Renewal Act (都市更新條例) contravenes Article 15 of the Constitution, which guarantees the right to property.
When discussing urban renewal disputes, the first thing to ensure is that, although urban renewal is related to private property rights and freedom of residence, importance should also be given to the social benefits of urban renewal.
Although the Council of Grand Justices’ Interpretation No. 709 states that some provisions of the Urban Renewal Act are unconstitutional, it also makes it clear that urban renewal can promote well-planned urban land redevelopment and that it is in the public interest to revitalize urban functions and improve the living environment.
In addition, more directly related to the general public is the guarantee of a safe living environment. Taiwan lies in the Pacific Rim seismic zone and National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering simulations show that if a magnitude 6.3 earthquake centered in the Taipei Basin were to occur, more than 4,000 buildings could collapse, causing damage to innumerable people and their property.
It must also be recognized that urban renewal is in the public interest in that it can help prevent major damage to people’s lives and property caused by natural disasters.
Since urban renewal is in the public interest, it should not be arbitrarily labeled as influence peddling on behalf of developers. The public interests pursued through urban renewal are not about the private economic interests of the developer or the majority of residents who agree to an urban renewal project. Rather, it is about major public interests, such as promoting urban development, improving the living environment and preventing disasters.
Therefore, the value of urban renewal is not limited to the resulting economic benefits.
The right to own property is a fundamental, constitutionally guaranteed public right. However, the guarantee is not absolute, as social responsibilities are concomitant to the right to own property, as can be seen in constitutional interpretations No. 564 and No. 577.
Constitutional Interpretations No. 542 and No. 739 also indicate that, on principles of legal reservation, proportionality and due process of law, the state may impose appropriate restrictions on people’s property rights and the freedom to choose and change residence.
The developer in this case had obtained the demolition permit in accordance with the provisions and although it was fined for failing to inform the resident of the process, these flaws should not be used as a reason to ignore the benefits of urban renewal or to view it as influence peddling.
As to whether the dissenting resident in this case had requested a price that was not commensurate with the value of the property right, and whether it was appropriate for him to go to Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je’s (柯文哲) ancestral home in Hsinchu to ask for lodging are issues that should be left for public opinion to judge.
However, this case highlights that behind the urban renewal controversy lies the need to clarify the definition of “private interest” and “public interest.” If these are not clearly defined, any talk about urban renewal serving the public interest will never be realized.
Kevin Liu is a partner at Lee and Li Attorneys-at-Law.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past