Government infomercials promoting pension reform “for the sake of children” do little more than add to the polarization of the debate. Stoking intergenerational conflict and sowing discord between generations, the advertisements met almost universal criticism, forcing the government to quietly remove them.
In an aging society with unequal allocation of resources, intergenerational equity and intergenerational justice have long been a worrying issue. About 10 years ago in France, a group of economists and social commentators in their 30s joined forces with a small number of baby boomer intellectuals and called for action on the issue.
In 2011, UK Conservative Minister of State for Universities and Science David Willetts accused the baby boomer generation of stealing the future of the next generation.
Baby boomers held the wealth and power in society and were responsible for the long working hours, low pay and high taxes young people were facing, Willetts said.
Not only did young people find it impossible to climb the property ladder, but they were also taking on large debts to pay for care for the elderly, he said.
However, Willetts was asked why he had neglected to mention the government’s policy to raise tuition fees, which led to so many young people accumulating debt to finance studies.
In the UK, the Intergenerational Foundation advocates legislation to protect the rights of the young and future generations. The EU also regularly publishes an intergenerational equity index, which shows how young people’s situation is worsening every year.
The foundation says that the more society ages, the leaner the pickings left for the young: In these circumstances, pension systems come to resemble a pyramid scheme, where youth pay for the elderly, but are not likely to enjoy the same benefits in their old age.
Such polarization deepens intergenerational division and tensions and makes the elderly feel guilty, fearing that they will be a burden to the younger generations. It also makes young people more hostile to the elderly and more anxious about their own old age.
In The Myth of Generational Conflict, French sociologists Claudine Attias-Donfut and Sara Arber challenge intergenerational polarization. They apply a life cycle concept to calculate lifetime contributions and rewards and establish an “intergenerational clearing system” that shows that baby boomers’ rewards in many cases do not outweigh their contributions.
They believe that the rise of intergenerational conflict in recent years is caused by a deterioration in public expenditure, that the elderly are scapegoats sacrificed in the competition for limited resources and that disputes over pension reform often coincide with economic recession.
The concept of intergenerational equity is based on generational reciprocity, which is a social contract for maintaining family and social ethics. During the 2012 French presidential election, a “generational contract” that would use a life course perspective to solve the intergenerational crisis was suggested.
The hardships facing Taiwan’s youth were not created by the older generation. They are the result of the nation’s political struggles, economic recession, educational reforms gone wrong, fiscal and tax policy failures and excessive public expenditure. These are the factors that have caused the young to lose their chances, abilities and future.
It would be both unwise and immoral of politicians if they continued to take advantage of the young by going on to deepen intergenerational hatred and conflict.
Chiou Tian-juh is a professor of social psychology at Shih Hsin University.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US