On the eve of the 70th anniversary of the 228 Incident, Academia Sinica associate research fellow Chen Yi-shen (陳儀深) published a book about the event, entitled The Sky Is Still Dark: Truth, Commemoration and Responsibility of the 228 Incident (天猶未光:二 二 八事件的真相、紀念與究責).
However, the academic conference where his book was released was interrupted by a group of protesters who had sneaked into the event.
The protesters ignored meeting procedures and gave out flyers, yelled insults and launched personal attacks on the speakers. Despite the host and other participants asking them to follow the rules, they continued to create a disturbance until police intervened.
This made me think of former deputy minister of national defense Lin Chong-pin (林中斌), who not long ago said in an interview with a Chinese media outlet that Beijing has deployed undercover agents in Taiwan’s military, political, economic and education agencies as well as other key organizations, adding that they could overthrow the government and paralyze the nation at any time.
Lin has always been highly respected across political lines for his trustworthiness, as he has always been well-informed and provides only correct information.
His remarks about the extent to which China has infiltrated Taiwan were shocking. Nevertheless, the fact that such a small conference could become the target of Chinese agents suggests that Lin did not exaggerate: Chinese agents are indeed everywhere and in great numbers.
This brings to mind the discipline of Taiwan’s military forces. I have met military personnel of different ranks in a variety of circumstances. Although I have only met a few, they all left a good impression on me. They were not only well-trained, quick and effective, but also well-spoken and personable.
Unfortunately, military discipline has been in rapid decline: Soldiers are spying for the enemy, are abused and commit suicide. Members of the public have been given special tours of brand-new helicopters, military have brought their helmets home and even lent them to friends, a tank fell into a creek during a drill killing four soldiers and drugs were recently found at an air base.
A group of generals visited China — still an enemy according to the Ministry of National Defense’s definition — and referred to Chinese officers as brothers, adding that they all belong to the same Chinese army.
They listened to a speech by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and stood up in respect for the Chinese national anthem.
Their actions raise questions about whether they really respect their own president.
Apparently, for those generals, the president is just a weak woman on whom they look down and do not mind embarrassing.
One general said that if it had not been for them risking their lives to defend the nation, Taiwan would not be at peace, adding that pension reform shows that soldiers are underappreciated. However, many are wondering if these brave warriors are the reason China has not invaded, or if it is because of the US’ warning to Beijing based on its Taiwan Relations Act.
Following several decades of brainwashing focused on “recovering the mainland,” Taiwanese have been expecting their soldiers to conquer China and kill its leaders. In contrast, these soldiers are living in comfort and enjoying a carefree lifestyle. Should we be happy about that, or ashamed?
Many generals have joined the demonstrations against pension reform in front of the Legislative Yuan, referring to themselves as the “800 Heroes” and treating legislators pushing for reform as the enemy. If the Chinese officers who they once called their brothers launched an attack on Taiwan, would these “heroes” treat them as friend or foe?
What has become of Taiwan?
Peng Ming-min is a former presidential adviser.
Translated by Tu Yu-an
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) is expected to be summoned by the Taipei City Police Department after a rally in Taipei on Saturday last week resulted in injuries to eight police officers. The Ministry of the Interior on Sunday said that police had collected evidence of obstruction of public officials and coercion by an estimated 1,000 “disorderly” demonstrators. The rally — led by Huang to mark one year since a raid by Taipei prosecutors on then-TPP chairman and former Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) — might have contravened the Assembly and Parade Act (集會遊行法), as the organizers had
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several