On the eve of the 70th anniversary of the 228 Incident, Academia Sinica associate research fellow Chen Yi-shen (陳儀深) published a book about the event, entitled The Sky Is Still Dark: Truth, Commemoration and Responsibility of the 228 Incident (天猶未光:二 二 八事件的真相、紀念與究責).
However, the academic conference where his book was released was interrupted by a group of protesters who had sneaked into the event.
The protesters ignored meeting procedures and gave out flyers, yelled insults and launched personal attacks on the speakers. Despite the host and other participants asking them to follow the rules, they continued to create a disturbance until police intervened.
This made me think of former deputy minister of national defense Lin Chong-pin (林中斌), who not long ago said in an interview with a Chinese media outlet that Beijing has deployed undercover agents in Taiwan’s military, political, economic and education agencies as well as other key organizations, adding that they could overthrow the government and paralyze the nation at any time.
Lin has always been highly respected across political lines for his trustworthiness, as he has always been well-informed and provides only correct information.
His remarks about the extent to which China has infiltrated Taiwan were shocking. Nevertheless, the fact that such a small conference could become the target of Chinese agents suggests that Lin did not exaggerate: Chinese agents are indeed everywhere and in great numbers.
This brings to mind the discipline of Taiwan’s military forces. I have met military personnel of different ranks in a variety of circumstances. Although I have only met a few, they all left a good impression on me. They were not only well-trained, quick and effective, but also well-spoken and personable.
Unfortunately, military discipline has been in rapid decline: Soldiers are spying for the enemy, are abused and commit suicide. Members of the public have been given special tours of brand-new helicopters, military have brought their helmets home and even lent them to friends, a tank fell into a creek during a drill killing four soldiers and drugs were recently found at an air base.
A group of generals visited China — still an enemy according to the Ministry of National Defense’s definition — and referred to Chinese officers as brothers, adding that they all belong to the same Chinese army.
They listened to a speech by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and stood up in respect for the Chinese national anthem.
Their actions raise questions about whether they really respect their own president.
Apparently, for those generals, the president is just a weak woman on whom they look down and do not mind embarrassing.
One general said that if it had not been for them risking their lives to defend the nation, Taiwan would not be at peace, adding that pension reform shows that soldiers are underappreciated. However, many are wondering if these brave warriors are the reason China has not invaded, or if it is because of the US’ warning to Beijing based on its Taiwan Relations Act.
Following several decades of brainwashing focused on “recovering the mainland,” Taiwanese have been expecting their soldiers to conquer China and kill its leaders. In contrast, these soldiers are living in comfort and enjoying a carefree lifestyle. Should we be happy about that, or ashamed?
Many generals have joined the demonstrations against pension reform in front of the Legislative Yuan, referring to themselves as the “800 Heroes” and treating legislators pushing for reform as the enemy. If the Chinese officers who they once called their brothers launched an attack on Taiwan, would these “heroes” treat them as friend or foe?
What has become of Taiwan?
Peng Ming-min is a former presidential adviser.
Translated by Tu Yu-an
The government and local industries breathed a sigh of relief after Shin Kong Life Insurance Co last week said it would relinquish surface rights for two plots in Taipei’s Beitou District (北投) to Nvidia Corp. The US chip-design giant’s plan to expand its local presence will be crucial for Taiwan to safeguard its core role in the global artificial intelligence (AI) ecosystem and to advance the nation’s AI development. The land in dispute is owned by the Taipei City Government, which in 2021 sold the rights to develop and use the two plots of land, codenamed T17 and T18, to the
Art and cultural events are key for a city’s cultivation of soft power and international image, and how politicians engage with them often defines their success. Representative to Austria Liu Suan-yung’s (劉玄詠) conducting performance and Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen’s (盧秀燕) show of drumming and the Tainan Jazz Festival demonstrate different outcomes when politics meet culture. While a thoughtful and professional engagement can heighten an event’s status and cultural value, indulging in political theater runs the risk of undermining trust and its reception. During a National Day reception celebration in Austria on Oct. 8, Liu, who was formerly director of the
US President Donald Trump has announced his eagerness to meet North Korean leader Kim Jong-un while in South Korea for the APEC summit. That implies a possible revival of US-North Korea talks, frozen since 2019. While some would dismiss such a move as appeasement, renewed US engagement with North Korea could benefit Taiwan’s security interests. The long-standing stalemate between Washington and Pyongyang has allowed Beijing to entrench its dominance in the region, creating a myth that only China can “manage” Kim’s rogue nation. That dynamic has allowed Beijing to present itself as an indispensable power broker: extracting concessions from Washington, Seoul
Taiwan’s labor force participation rate among people aged 65 or older was only 9.9 percent for 2023 — far lower than in other advanced countries, Ministry of Labor data showed. The rate is 38.3 percent in South Korea, 25.7 percent in Japan and 31.5 percent in Singapore. On the surface, it might look good that more older adults in Taiwan can retire, but in reality, it reflects policies that make it difficult for elderly people to participate in the labor market. Most workplaces lack age-friendly environments, and few offer retraining programs or flexible job arrangements for employees older than 55. As