Amid the din of the excavating machines and the rumble of dumpers removing and hauling tonnes of earth, the voice of indigenous communities in Pakistan’s Sindh Province has been drowned out.
Nabi Bux, a resident of Sehnri Dars in the province’s Thar desert, can attest as much. His village, roughly 400km from the port city of Karachi, has been acquired by Sindh Engro Coal Mining Co and, as a result, he and about 1,800 fellow residents are to be relocated 25km away.
“Engro is making brand new homes for us, but the spiritual attachment we have to our ancestral land is lost to them,” he said. “Nor can you put a price tag to it.”
Illustration: Mountain People
The Sindh government is backing the project, under which the villagers were coerced into selling their land in the “greater national interest.”
Official estimates suggest that there are 175 billion tonnes of lignite coal reserves beneath the 9,000km2 stretch of land — enough to last “400 years,” according to Pakistani Minister of Planning and Development Ahsan Iqbal — and the villagers were promised that the sale would bring personal as well as national prosperity.
“Our elders had predicted the day would come when we’d be asked to move out,” Bux said.
Serious power shortages have crippled industry — in summer, Pakistan faces a shortfall of more than 6,000 megawatts — and many see coal as the only resource that can save the country from total darkness.
Last month, during the signing of an agreement with China for a power generation project, the electricity went off twice, plunging the conference hall into darkness for a few minutes. The agreement papers were reviewed using mobile phone flashlights.
However, many are alarmed by Pakistan’s insistence on turning to coal. Among them is Abid Suleri, executive director of the Islamabad-based Sustainable Development Policy Institute, who likens the approach to “investing in an old gramophone.”
Suleri believes coal cannot be exploited if the global temperature rise is to remain below 2°C.
“Pakistan had signed and ratified climate declarations in Paris and Morocco — what of them?” he asked.
If Pakistan has to invest in coal, it must also invest in renewable energy, Suleri said.
“We should not put ourselves in the absolute either/or situation, but adopt a more flexible one, dabbling in a good mix,” he added.
Suleri feels that, were there a need for Pakistan to stop using coal overnight, the country should be able to cope without difficulty.
Yet, for people living close to the dumping site in Sehnri Dars, it is living with coal rather than living without it that is the problem.
“The entire village — our homes, utensils, clothes, trees, you name it — everything is covered with a thick sheet of dust due to the digging and the dumping of soil,” Bux said. “I shudder to think what will happen in June when strong gusts blow.”
The relocation will not start before next year, Sindh Engro said.
The villagers of Sehnri Dars might have acquiesced, but people in the 12 villages around Gorano have not; they feel cheated. They have held a sit-in outside the press club in Islamkot, an adjoining town, for more than 100 days in protest at the construction of a reservoir in Gorano, which began in May last year.
The reservoir is to store about 850 to 990 liters per second of effluent from the coal mine over the next three years.
“When we found out that the water will carry 5,000ppm [parts per million] for the total dissolved solids we got really worried,” Lakshman Dharmu said. “In less than three years, our sweet water wells will become poisonous, rendering our land unfit either for cultivation or grazing, because this water will seep and affect the groundwater.”
There are 30 such wells.
A spokesman from the mining company said it would take 14 years for any damage to occur to land within a 1km radius, adding that it would not use the reservoir for more than three years.
The villagers in June last year filed a complaint in a high court saying that the company acquired land by invoking certain sections of the Land Acquisition Act of 1894, which allows the mining authority to acquire land, but only after seeking permission from the land owner.
“But we never granted them permission,” said Leela Ram Manjiani, a local resident who is a lawyer and is representing the villagers.
He said they were not even told.
While the protest continues, the coal company has been busy buying land from villagers who are willing to sell.
The rest is government land, for which the company has already received permission, spokesman Mohsin Babbar said.
“Of the total 532 acres [215 hectares], we have bought 250 acres of land from the locals; 700 acres is government land that we have permission to use. That just leaves 282 or so acres that remains disputed. We have offered them about 300 acres of pasture land not very far from where they are right now, but they are not accepting this compensation,” Babbar said.
The villagers do not have papers to prove it is their land, “and those who do still have it in the names of their forefathers. To get the land transferred to their name requires a lot of money, which they don’t have,” Manjiani said.
“On the one side, the locals are uneducated, belong to a religious minority and do not really have a voice, and on the other side is a powerful entity,” said Suleri, who fears this will give the state an upper hand and the infractions of the mining company will be ignored by authorities, who are fully supporting the project and marginalizing the indigenous people.
“We will not back off, we will go to the [Pakistani] Supreme Court,” Manjiani said. “We have full faith in the courts.”
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers